SOLUTION:
Case: Hypothesis testing
Step 1: Null and Alternative hypotheses
Step 2: T-test analysis
Step 3: t-test with the significance level
Step 4: Comparing
So tail to reject the null hypothesis. There is enough evidence at a 0.05 level of significance to claim that the mean spent is greater than P127.50.
Final answer:
Yes, there is evidence sufficient to conclude that the mean amount spent is greater than P127.50 per month at a 0.05 level of significance.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The area of a sector has the formula
Hopefully, this looks somewhat familiar to you. Theta is the central angle given as 75, r is the radius given as 4. Filling in:
and simplifying that a bit to look less threatening, but not by much:
and
Not sure how you're supposed to express your answer so I gave both the fraction and its decimal equivalency.
$18,617.75 is the answer
$87,525-$77,100=$10,425 (the amount over $77,100)
$10,425 x .28=$2,919 (the 28% taxed amount over $77,100)
$2,919+$15,698.75 (the already taxed amount in the chart)=$18,617.75
Answer:
7^8 =5764801 * 7^3 =343 * 7^4 =2401 ÷ 7^9 = 40353607 * 7^5 =16807
5764801 *343 *2401 ÷ 40353607 *16807
=4747561509943 ÷ 678223072849 = 7
8,500,000
Round the number 4 to 5 because the number 7 is behind it.
