First, we calculated the discounted price which would have been paid by Keith. That is the product of 85% and $36,000.
($36,000) x (85%) = $30,600
Then, after negotiating to pay 9% off the sale price, he will only need to pay 91% of the sale price. The new price would be,
($30600) x (0.91) = $27846
Thus, Keith will only need to pay $27,846.
Answer:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = No possible child abuse or neglect
Alternative hypothesis: Uₐ = Possible child abuse or neglect
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = No possible child abuse or neglect
Alternative hypothesis: Uₐ = Possible child abuse or neglect
A type I error occurs when you reject the null hypothesis when it is true. In this situation, a type I error occurs when you conclude on possible child neglect or abuse and place the child in protective custody
A type II error occurs when you accept the null hypothesis when it is false. In this instance, a type II error occurs when you conclude on no possible child abuse or neglect when there is and fail to remove the child from the home.
In this case, the type II error is the more serious error. Failure to remove the child when there is possible child abuse or neglect will lead to more detrimental effect. Although, the type I error is also serious, it is not so detrimental as the type II error.
nice drawing
(altho I think this is for other subject)
