9514 1404 393
Answer:
x-intercept: (16, 0)
y-intercept: (0, 8)
Step-by-step explanation:
Each intercept is found by setting the other variable to zero and solving for the variable of interest.
I like to find the intercepts from this form because it basically involves dividing the constant by the variable coefficient.
<u>x-intercept</u>
y = 0, so we have 4x = 64 ⇒ x = 64/4 = 16
x-intercept is (16, 0)
<u>y-intercept</u>
x = 0, so we have 8y = 64 ⇒ y = 64/8 = 8
y-intercept is (0, 8)
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
There is a form of the linear equation called the "intercept form" that looks like this:
x/a +y/b = 1
where 'a' is the x-intercept and 'b' is the y-intercept.
You can get this form by dividing the standard form equation by the constant. Here, that gives ...
4x/64 +8y/64 = 1
x/16 +y/8 = 1
This is nice because it gives both intercepts with one operation (divide by the constant). It's easy enough to do, but not always easy to explain. This form of the equation of a line is rarely seen.
Add 4/5 and 1/5 to make 5/5 or 1 mile the subtract 1 from 2 1/2 to equal 1 1/2 miles
The computed value must closely match the real value for a model to be considered valid. If the percentage of pleased or very satisfied students remains close to 75% after Mateo surveys additional students, Mateo's model is still viable. The model is faulty if the opposite is true.
<h3>How will mateo know whether his model is valid or not?</h3>
In general, a valid model is one whose estimated value is close to the real value. This kind of model is considered to be accurate. It must be somewhat near to the real value if it doesn't resemble the real value.
If the findings of the survey are sufficiently similar to one another, then the model may be considered valid.
P1 equals 75%, which is the real assessment of the number of happy pupils
P2 is 70 percent; this represents the second assessment of happy pupils
In conclusion, The estimated value of a model has to be somewhat close to the real value for the model to be considered valid. If the number of students who are either pleased or extremely satisfied remains close to 75 percent following Mateo's survey of more students, then Mateo's model is likely accurate. In any other scenario, the model cannot be trusted.
Read more about probability
brainly.com/question/795909
#SPJ1
Step-by-step explanation:
Perimeter of a rectangle = 2(L+W)
L is the length of the rectangle:
W is the width of the rectangle.
Given
Perimeter = 214feet
If the length is 41 ft longer than the width, then L = 41+W
Substitute L = 41+W into the formula:
P = 2(L+W)
214 = 2(41+W+W)
214 = 2(41+2W)
214 = 82+4W
4W = 214-82
4W = 132
W = 132/4
W = 33 feet
Since L = 41+W
L = 41+33
L = 74 feet
Hence the dimension of the field is 74ft by 33ft
<em>The width of the playing field is 33feet</em>