Answer: Because it showed that change is possible
Explanation/context:
The medieval era had been one in which the Roman Catholic Church dominated the culture of Europe, and it was thought that no one could successfully challenge such a deeply ingrained institution. However, the Reformation movement by Martin Luther and other Protestant figures showed that even something as entrenched and enduring at the Catholic Church could be challenged, and changes could be accomplished. Even during Martin Luther's lifetime, this idea that change was possible motivated people to launch efforts toward other major changes to powerful systems. The Peasants Revolt that occurred in Germany in 1524-1525 took Luther's push for reform in the church and applied it to make a push for change in feudal society. Martin Luther himself didn't agree with that and opposed the Peasants Revolt, but as Schaff points out, the momentum of the Reformation was a "propelling force" inspiring other "forward movements" to make changes in society.
Answer:
d) american companies continuing to trade with countries fighting with germany
Explanation:
Pure capitalism can be seen in the US. Businesses are run using capital. Those with the capital have a better edge in running the market. Capital investments, shares, labor, and industries are capital based.<span> The economy gets interconnected with capital. Thus, this makes the US a good capitalist model. However, in this design i</span><span>mprovements and profits are not equalized but heavily competed.</span>
<span>On the other hand in socialism, industries are all nationalized or operated by the government. </span><span> </span><span>The concern of this economic system is to equally divide the wealth among the people.</span><span> </span><span> </span><span>Everything is centered on the government to control.</span>
Everyone relies on themselves only.