The answer for this question is A
The first one is an appeal to the reader's sense of logic and the second is an appeal to the readers emotions
The answer is: dangling modifier.
Dangling modifiers are separate from the word they modify, resulting in ambiguity, confusion or nonsense. In the example sentence, it is not clear which animal is walking the wire - whether the dog or the squirrel. Supposing the squirrel (which is about to fall) is walking the wire, a correct version of the sentence would be:
My dog waited for the squirrel to fall, which was walking the wire.
<span>D.Yes, he states: “While, then, every part of our country thus feels an immediate and particular interest in union, all the parts combined cannot fail to find in the united mass of means and efforts greater strength. . .”
From the statement above, we could only infer that the statement is just an opinion. Evidence should have some sort of hard data, either it's a quantitative or qualitative data.</span>
