Answer:
<em>Total cash flow to stockholders   13,320</em>
<em />
Explanation:
We should consider the actual cash paid by the firm in favor of the stockholders. Net income doesn't represent cashflow is the amount earned by the company but a portion of it is reinvested or hold by the firm. What it matter for cashflwo arethe cash dividends and treasury stock as these are actual cashflow in going into the stockholders pockets
from dividends                               4,535 
from stock repurchase                <u>   8,785   </u>
<em>Total cash flow to stockholders   13,320</em>
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
a. Capitalized : Equipment
b. Expensed
c. Capitalized : Building
d. Expensed
e. Capitalized : Equipment
f.  Capitalized : Building
g. Capitalized : Building
h. Capitalized : Equipment
Explanation:
The Cost of Property, Plant and Equipment item according to IAS 16 includes, the Purchase Cost and any cost directly incurred in putting the assets in location and condition intended for use by management.
The costs exclude amounts collected in tax on behalf of third parties
Also not Capital expenditures increase the earning ability of the asset whilst  revenue expenditure is the maintenance of such asset.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
The loan is an interest only loan since he is only paying the interest potion of 7% 
Interest only loan is when the borrower pays only the interest for some or all the term of the loan with no changes in the borrowed amount
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The correct answer is normative analysis.
Explanation:
A positive analysis is the one that attempts to reflect reality with statements of cause and effect and is used mainly in microeconomics. On the other hand, a normative analysis, in which reality is prescribed, that is, we go beyond explanation and prediction, value judgments are used.
In contrast to the positive analysis, the normative analysis responds how the law should achieve efficiency objectives. This analysis assumes that efficiency is an objective that law should reflect and that legal norms should change when they fail. From this perspective, efficiency is a social value that the Law should promote.
 
        
             
        
        
        
$250
COVERAGE LIMIT-DEDUCTIBLE = $4000-$1500 = 2500
$2500/10 = $250