Hello there,
The "prime factor's" of 1,386 would be "2*3*3*7*11.
When we multiply those together. We get 1,386.
Hope this helps.
~Jurgen
<1 and <2 are complementary : given
<1+<2=90 : definition of complementary
<1 congruent <3 : given
<2 congruent <4 : given
<3 congruent <4 : transitive property
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to find the center and the radius of this circle, you have to complete the square on it. And only for the x-terms, because the y term is squared and there is no other y term. We'll get to that in a second.
Take half the linear x-term, square it and add it to both sides. Our linear term is 10. Half of 10 is 5, and 5 squared is 25. We add 25 to both sides:
The reason we do this is to create a perfect square binomial inside that set of parenthesis. Simplifying the right side as well gives us:
This tells us that the center is (-5, 0). Remember when I said we would get back to the y terms? Because there was only a y-squared and no other y terms, that is the same as writing the equation as
The radius is the square root of the constant. So the radius is 6.
D is the graph you want.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The complete question is given thus:
Suppose that computer literacy among people ages 40 and older is being studied and that the accompanying tables describes the probability distribution for four randomly selected people, where x is the number that are computer literate. Is it unusual to find four computer literates among four randomly selected people?
x P(x)
0 0.16
1 0.25
2 0.36
3 0.15
4 0.08
ANSWER:
The odds that this will occur according to the chart are 0.08, or 8%, so although this is unlikely, it's not terribly unusual.
⇒ NO
So from the following we can say it is not unusual to find four (4) computer literates among four randomly selected people.
ok, so P(1) + P(2) + P(3) + P(4) + P(0) = 0.16+0.25+0.36+0.15+0.08 = 1
Whereas the chance of finding four (4) out of four (4) computer iteration is low when compared to other factors.
cheers i hope this helped !!
