Not of Bernoulli type, but still linear.

There's no need to find an integrating factor, since the left hand side already represents a derivative:
![\dfrac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dx}[(1+x^2)y]=(1+x^2)\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dx}+2xy](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdfrac%7B%5Cmathrm%20d%7D%7B%5Cmathrm%20dx%7D%5B%281%2Bx%5E2%29y%5D%3D%281%2Bx%5E2%29%5Cdfrac%7B%5Cmathrm%20dy%7D%7B%5Cmathrm%20dx%7D%2B2xy)
So, you have
![\dfrac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dx}[(1+x^2)y]=4x^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdfrac%7B%5Cmathrm%20d%7D%7B%5Cmathrm%20dx%7D%5B%281%2Bx%5E2%29y%5D%3D4x%5E2)
and integrating both sides with respect to

yields


Answer: e) 6
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x be mother + children = 18
Father's age = 38
Average age of the family = 14
38 + 18x /( x + 1 )= 14
Opening the bracket
38 + 18x = 14x + 14
Collecting like terms
24 = 4x
x = 6
no of children in the family is 6.
Answer:
negative multiples of 3 less than -3
Step-by-step explanation:
if m <9, then
m ={8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0,-1,-2,....,..........}
And |6m-55|
So is said that,
when, m= 8
6(8)-55=-6
when, m=7
6(7)-54=-12
when, m = 6
6(6)-54=-18
Since the trend is negative multiples of 3 less than -3
this is my answer
ANSWER

EXPLANATION
Recall that,

That is why

is equivalent to

This implies that,

This is the same as,

When we are dividing by

we move the decimal point backwards two times.
This implies that,