The correct answer is both states actively promoted the development and spread of Islam.
<span>The
mechanism establishing natural price by Adam Smith connects with effective
demand and free competition. If you cut the supply of goods, the demand for
them is higher. Because of this, there competition between buyers. Afraid not
get the right product, they agree to buy it at a higher cost. The market price
will rise. When supply and demand are roughly equal, the market value
corresponds to approximately natural.</span>
Democratic ideals were incorporated into colonial governments through many key events in the history of the colonies; firstly through the <span>Formation of the Virginia House of Burgesses and the signing of the Mayflower Compact, representational government and agreement for self-government; with the petition of rights, the colonists then established, with the formation of the colonial government and the separation with the Crown, and the voting system enabling self-government, allowed for the democratic opinion and voice of the colonists to be heard.</span>
Answer:
Answer Below:
Explanation:
In economics, economic equilibrium is a situation in which economic forces such as supply and demand are balanced and in the absence of external influences the (equilibrium) values of economic variables will not change. For example, in the standard text perfect competition, equilibrium occurs at the point at which quantity demanded and quantity supplied are equal.[1] Market equilibrium in this case is a condition where a market price is established through competition such that the amount of goods or services sought by buyers is equal to the amount of goods or services produced by sellers. This price is often called the competitive price or market clearing price and will tend not to change unless demand or supply changes, and quantity is called the "competitive quantity" or market clearing quantity. But the concept of equilibrium in economics also applies to imperfectly competitive markets, where it takes the form of a Nash equilibrium.
Answer:
Torrez’s view of the long-term impact of the Spanish rule in New Mexico and the long-term impact of the Metacom’s war is different in many cases. Torrez viewed the impact of Spanish rule in New Mexico as more beneficial. The technology, food, and tools that were spread to the region by the Spanish were used by the Pueblos. These factors became a prominent part of their life, as they started using cattle, sheep, fruit trees, and more for survival and nourishment. Many also proceeded to convert to Christianity and were influenced by the teachings of the Franciscans. However, the impact of the Metacom’s War was less significant. These wars were over the desire of the Europeans to pressure the Native Americans off of their lands, so they can get control. The Europeans tried to get the natives drunk so they can cheat them into bargains and other processes. However, the long-term impact doesn’t ultimately show that the Natives benefitted, but rather that they were involved in a string of battles against European powers. Also, these European powers fought over each other for control, and also fought against the indigenous people. The long-term impact was not beneficial, but rather that a string of battles took place, and there was more violence between the natives and the colonists. However, both revolts are similar in the way that the cause of the revolt was the colonists abusing the labor and relationship between the natives and the colonists. The root cause of the revolts is extremely similar in this sense.
Explanation:
