The assistant chief of police has decided to forego using the polygraph test on a suspect and will use a different technique to assess the suspect's physiological responses to crime-scene details. This is known as the guilty knowledge test.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Guilty Knowledge Tests (GKT's) refers a psycho-physiological survey method that could be used in a polygraph test to find whether suspects are hiding "guilt" by measuring their physiological answers to multiple choice questions.
50 participants were randomly selected to commit one of two real false crimes. Later they were tried with GKT for crimes and things they did not know about. Using the best scoring systems, as per logistic regression analysis, this test correctly classifies 84% innocent and to 76% criminals.
I believe the answer is: <span>be difficult to assure that the use of information gathered would do no harm
Anthropology studies the cultures and habbits that exist in a certain society and make a conclusion based on their observation.
There are a lot of cases when the conclusion of their observation is wrong and could ignite conflicts between different social groups. To prevent such things from happening, the rule above was created.</span>
A. voting rights could not be denied based on race.
B. voting rights could not be denied based on gender.
C. poll taxes became illegal and unconstitutional.
D. literacy tests became illegal and unconstitutional.
The fifteenth amendment states that "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of <em>race</em>, <em>color</em>, or <em>previous condition of servitude</em>."
There was no mention of gender, so voting for women hadn't been legalized until 1919, making B wrong.
Answer:
rehab
Explanation:
restoring someone to health or normal life through training and therapy after imprisonment, addiction, or illness.
the action of restoring someone to former privileges or reputation after a period of disfavor.
the action of restoring something that has been damaged to its former condition.
Answer:
Explanation:
First of all i will tell the person to come to me after work so that i will not embarrass him in front of our co-workers.then after work when he comes to me i will talk to him about how its unfair to make such a comment for someone religious belief cause just because the persons belief is different from yours that doesn't you should do something like that. he entitled to his own and your entitled to yours .so as conclusion after that i will tell him to not do it again. and apologize to whoever he made a rude comment about his religious beliefs .
hope this helps.
