I personally believe it’s ok because we can all have a different opinion. And also there morals from back then were VERY different compared to morals from our days. So it’s normal that we judge there morals and actions.
My answer made sense in my head, so I hope it makes sense to you!
LOL
Answer:
A group has the potential to collect more complete information, compared to an individual, while making decisions. An individual uses his own intuition and views. A group has many members, so its many views and many approaches result in better decision-making.
Explanation:
Hope this will help
I believe that the correct answer is 2
Answer:
Conflict.
Explanation:
In a conflict sociological perspective, to effectively understand social behaviors between competing groups, it is best to view them in terms of tension between the groups.
A role conflict can be defined as a situation in which an individual experience competing, contradictory and perhaps incompatible demands (expectations) from two or more groups.
Simply stated, role conflict arises due to incompatible and contradictory expectations bestowed on an individual due to the position they hold
In this scenario, Fernando's position as mayor of a city requires him to satisfy his wealthy sponsors as well as many middle-class workers. The tension he feels between these two demands is referred to as role conflict.
