3 years ago

Under what circumstances, if any, should people be prohibited from voicing unpopular views? Explain your answer.

1 answer:

7 0

Answer:

In my opinion, people should not be prohibited from expressing their opinions under any circumstances, given the individual freedom of each individual to think independently, unless the ideas expressed were totally contrary to the common good (such as expressions that promote terrorism or defending regimes such as Nazism).

In other words, as long as the opinions of individuals do not promote violence or damage to society, they should be allowed, to guarantee the freedom of expression of citizens.

You might be interested in

In the case of ________, the Supreme Court gave the lower courts some discretion over how they applied the test for qualified im

asambeis [7]

Answer:

Pearson v. Callahan

Explanation:

This was a case that was decided by the United States which would deal with the doctrine of qualified immunity.

Hope this Helps!

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Brianna has saved money for college. She will need to write checks or use a debit card to pay tuition two or three times a year,

grandymaker [24]

Answer: I thinks its a checking account

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A case has reached the Supreme Court, but not as a matter of appeal. How did it most likely get there

slava [35]

Answer:

Invoking original jurisdiction is the only nonappeal way in which cases can reach the Court.

Explanation:

.....

3 0

2 years ago

Public wrongs such as drug dealing, auto theft, and arson are violations of ____ and are prosecuted by the State.

oksano4ka [1.4K]

Criminal law is the answer

3 0

2 years ago

determine what type of evidence the following may be: A man holding a book of matches at the scene of a fire

Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

Well, The only specific evidence we have at the current scene would be that man that has a book of matches but sense we cant really determine whether or not he was the one who did it, therefore we have no exponential evidence that he did it.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago