~Hello there!
Your question: Trust busting, the suffragettes, and the pure food and drug act are associated with the ________.
Your answer: Trust busting, the suffragettes, and the pure food and drug act are associated with the Progressive Era.
Any questions ^?
Happy Studying!
The answer is a superordinate goal. This is something that is sufficiently enormous and sufficiently convincing to help people and gatherings disregard individual contrasts keeping in mind the end goal to accomplish something altogether past their present achieve, something that can't be secretly held by any of the individuals, and is rather nearer in nature to a Commons.
one of the reason's why the colonist fought the British is because the colonists weren't being represented in the British parliament (government) and the king was imposing taxes and levies on the colonists. Have you ever heard the phase Taxation without Representation? I believe that was the major reason why they fought the British.
Hopefully this helps.
The direct democracy or pure democracy it´s a form of democracy in which the people directly decides on policy initiatives, it differs from the representative democracy; the one that it´s currently established in the majority of the countries; because in that the people choose the representantives and they are those who decide the policies to carry on. In the representative democracy the people do not govern, it´s a common mistake to mix both concepts.
Two different forms of direct democracy are participatory democracy and deliberative democracy. The deliberative democracy is a form in which the deliberation it´s a central matter to the decisions and it is seen as an amalgalm of the direct and the representative democracies. It holds that for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by an authentic deliberation not a mere voting.
The participatory democracy is one that emphasizes the broad participation of everybody but it demands to the citizens to be more involved in the political participation.
I think that a group taking a vote on something is an example of a participatory democracy because everyone have the same power to create consensus and, at last it would win the iniciative that obtain more votes. If the example was a representative democracy then the group would have to vote for only one person to make a decision and then the group will follow the "leader" choice althought it goes against the majority of what the group wants.
I hope the answer to be useful for you. Regards.
