Answer:
so hirap
Step-by-step explanation:
soooooooooo hirapppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
Answer:
5b(-a+2)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The data are at the
<u>Nominal</u> level of measurement.
The given calculation is wrong because average (mean) cannot be calculated for nominal level of measurement.
Step-by-step explanation:
The objective here is to Identify the level of measurement of the data, and explain what is wrong with the given calculation.
a)
The data are at the <u> Nominal </u> level of measurement due to the fact that it portrays the qualitative levels of naming and representing different hierarchies from 100 basketball, 200 basketball, 300 football, 400 anything else
b) We are being informed that, the average (mean) is calculated for 597 respondents and the result is 256.1.
The given calculation is wrong because average (mean) cannot be calculated for nominal level of measurement. At nominal level this type of data set do not measure at all , it is not significant to compute their average (mean).
Is it SV squared? Or times 2
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
First, convert all the secants and cosecants to cosine and sine, respectively. Recall that 
and 
.
Thus:
Let's do the first part first: (Recall how to divide fractions)
For the second term:
So, all together: (same denominator; combine terms)
Note the numerator; it can be derived from the Pythagorean Identity:
Thus, we can substitute the numerator:
Everything simplifies to 1.
