The strange claim that Brutus and Cassius made about Friendship is where they said that they had acted as Julius Caesars' friends by reducing the time it took to be afraid of death.
<h3>Why is the above claim strange?</h3>
Brutus' claim is strange because friends do not kill one another.
Recall that Brutus was not even Cassius' real friend as he had deceived him into the act. True friendship is not based on deception either.
See the link below for more about Julius Caesar:
brainly.com/question/1324420
The correct answer is C. <span>The speaker in In Memoriam, A. H. H. is the poet, but the speaker in “The Lady of Shalott” lacks a specific identity.
"In Memoriam, A. H. H." is a very personal poem about the loss of Tennyson's dear friend. The speaker talks in the 1st person, thus providing the poem with a tone of deep, personal grief over the friend's premature death. The poem is rich with drama, as the speaker questions God's existence, Christian ethics, wonders and enigmas of nature...
On the other hand, the speaker in "The Lady of Shalott" is anonymous but, in a way, omniscient - as if he knows everything, all the secrets, intimate feelings of the mysterious Lady, magical spells that bind her.</span>
Answer:
spongeyyy heyyyy i cant unlock it but whats ur question lemme see if i can help find it
Explanation:
krabby patty
I would say C or A. i have a feeling that its A thow hope that helps if im wrong sorry.
Since the sentence of option B doesn't have the sync both the clauses to make it meaning, it contains error.
Answer: B
Explanation:
As we see option A, it seems meaningful as the animals sought shelter while the night drew near. Same case occur with option C and D as in option C, the trees are rustling due to the passing of brisk winds through their branches and in option D, stars will obviously appear brighter as the darkness grows.
But, in the option B, there is no co-ordination of both the clauses of the sentences. The disappearance of the Sun has nothing to do with the silence of woods in a direct manner. Although we can understand it indirectly that in the absence of natural light, animals might consider it as night and sought shelter. Since all other sentences have directly linked clauses, option B is showing indirect relation. Hence, it may be the desired answer as error.
