The above excerpt highlights the conflict between:
the Phippsburg townspeople, who do not think much of Malaga Island, and Turner, who comes to love the island.
The story “Lizzie Bright and the Buckminster Boy” is about the life of a young white boy. He witnesses a change in his life when he meets a black American girl of his same age. The story has been inspired by historical situations and events. The theme of the story revolves around freedom and imprisonment. Since Tuner was the son of the minister, he was expected to maintain the decorum because of which he has to avoid his youthful and jolly nature. At the end of the story Reverend sides with the Phippsburg townspeople against the people of Malaga Island as the Reverend comes to know that Turner had went to the Island with Lizzie.
Answer:
C. Anaphora
Explanation:
An analogy is a comparison of things using figurative language/imagery. So Choice A is incorrect.
Logos is a persuasive technique. It appeals to people's <em>logic. </em>The phrase "He has" doesn't appeal to logic. So Choice B is incorrect.
Parallelism means a close connection between two things/two things that mirror each other. "He has" does not parallel anything. So Choice D is incorrect.
A Red Herring is a misleading or false statement meant to negate or confuse the audience. This doesn't make sense in terms of "He has," so Choice E is incorrect.
By process of elimination, we're left with C. Anaphora. An anaphora is the repetion of a word or phrase at the start of several sentences. This makes sense and is the most logical answer.
Answer:
If Biden is elected, everything would be closed including schools. People will die due to lack of money and jobs (also customers). A virus that has 99% recovery rate below 60
If Trump is elected, No one will be interfered. And everyone will continue their business as usual. Schools & businesses will be open. People will wear masks as they please.
The correct answer is B. They would go into small spaces of the machines in factories that adults could not reach.
Explanation:
During the period of industrialization from the 18th century to the 19th-century child labor was common as more workers were required and also families struggle to get enough money. Indeed, during this time it was common children as young as four or five years old worked in factories and mines where they would go into machines or other places adults could not reach or would do tasks that require small hands. Additionally, children were paid less, did not attend school and worked in hazardous and difficult conditions which often led to accidents or injuries. Thus, the statement that describes the common role of working children during industrialization is "They would go into small spaces of the machines in factories that adults could not reach".
