A)ab b)bh c)gc d)fe help me please

Mathematics

2 answers:

mamaluj [8]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Its a

Step-by-step explanation:

Svet_ta [14]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Letter C) bh

Step-by-step explanation:

Segment bh is straight across cd and parallel line extend in the same direction but never intersect.

Hope this helps

You might be interested in

Use stoke's theorem to evaluate∬m(∇×f)⋅ds where m is the hemisphere x^2+y^2+z^2=9, x≥0, with the normal in the direction of the

ludmilkaskok [199]

By Stokes' theorem,

$\displaystyle\int_{\partial\mathcal M}\mathbf f\cdot\mathrm d\mathbf r=\iint_{\mathcal M}\nabla\times\mathbf f\cdot\mathrm d\mathbf S$

where $\mathcal C$ is the circular boundary of the hemisphere $\mathcal M$ in the $y$ - $z$ plane. We can parameterize the boundary via the "standard" choice of polar coordinates, setting

$\mathbf r(t)=\langle 0,3\cos t,3\sin t\rangle$

where $0\le t\le2\pi$ . Then the line integral is

$\displaystyle\int_{\mathcal C}\mathbf f\cdot\mathrm d\mathbf r=\int_{t=0}^{t=2\pi}\mathbf f(x(t),y(t),z(t))\cdot\dfrac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dt}\langle x(t),y(t),z(t)\rangle\,\mathrm dt$
$=\displaystyle\int_0^{2\pi}\langle0,0,3\cos t\rangle\cdot\langle0,-3\sin t,3\cos t\rangle\,\mathrm dt=9\int_0^{2\pi}\cos^2t\,\mathrm dt=9\pi$

We can check this result by evaluating the equivalent surface integral. We have

$\nabla\times\mathbf f=\langle1,0,0\rangle$

and we can parameterize $\mathcal M$ by

$\mathbf s(u,v)=\langle3\cos v,3\cos u\sin v,3\sin u\sin v\rangle$

so that

$\mathrm d\mathbf S=(\mathbf s_v\times\mathbf s_u)\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv=\langle9\cos v\sin v,9\cos u\sin^2v,9\sin u\sin^2v\rangle\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv$

where $0\le v\le\dfrac\pi2$ and $0\le u\le2\pi$ . Then,

$\displaystyle\iint_{\mathcal M}\nabla\times\mathbf f\cdot\mathrm d\mathbf S=\int_{v=0}^{v=\pi/2}\int_{u=0}^{u=2\pi}9\cos v\sin v\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv=9\pi$

as expected.

7 0

3 years ago

TC= 0.0001Q^2-0.02Q+5+500Q

Leona [35]

Answer: 0

−

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

A new test has been developed to detect a particular type of cancer. The test must be evaluated before it is put into use. A med

Troyanec [42]

The tree diagram of the problem above is attached
There are four outcomes of the two events,

First test - Cancer, Second Test - Cancer, the probability is 0.0396
First test - Cancer, Second Test - No Cancer, the probability is 0.0004
First test - No Cancer, Second Test - There is cancer, the probability is 0.0096
First test - No cancer, Second Test - No cancer, the probability is 0.9054

The probability of someone picked at random has cancer given that test result indicates cancer is $\frac{0.0396}{0.0396+0.0096}= \frac{33}{41}$

The probability of someone picked at random has cancer given that test result indicates no cancer is $\frac{0.0396}{0.0004+0.9504} = \frac{99}{2377}$