1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Law Incorporation [45]
3 years ago
6

Can someone help me it’s for a quiz

Business
1 answer:
oee [108]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

2/3

Explanation:

there are 3 odds and 1 blue out of 6 options

You might be interested in
Discuss the trolley experiments Spur and Fat Man with specific reference to how the two have distinct differences within the Doc
Ne4ueva [31]

Answer:

In the "Spur", the choice is between killing five strangers or one loved one. You could pull a lever to redirect the train coming at the five men. You would still be killing the one man tied to sidetrack, but you would save the lives of those other five men.

In the "Fat Man", a runaway train is coming toward five men that are all tied down to the tracks. The train has to be stopped in order to save the lives of those five men. You are the onlooker of this scenario, and you are standing on top of a footbridge looking down at the train situation. There happens to be a fat man standing next to you, and he is a complete stranger. You have the option of pushing him off the bridge in order to save those five men, but you would end up killing the fat man. The philosophical question is whether or not you would kill the fat man in order to save those five lives.thexplanation:

The reason that this scenario is different morally is that you would physically have to push this fat man onto the tracks when he was not in the path of that oncoming train.

The whole concept of the trolley problem is based on the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE). This doctrine basically states that if you are doing something morally good, which has a morally bad side-effect, it is still ethically okay to go through with that morally good action.

In Spur you don't have to push anyone in the way of the train, you just redirect the train by using a lever. Fat Man scenario is seen as worse because he wasn't in the path of the train. You push him into the path of an oncoming train. Seen as morally worse.

7 0
4 years ago
The firm's fixed costs are $60 000, variable cost per unit is $15 and selling price per unit is $20. The contribution margin per
kicyunya [14]

Answer:

See below

Explanation:

With regards to the above, the contribution margin is computed as;

Contribution margin per unit = Selling price per unit - Variable cost per unit

Selling price per unit = $20

Variable cost per unit = $15

Then,

Contribution margin per unit = $20 - $15

Contribution margin per unit = $5

7 0
3 years ago
To what extent are roads public goods?​
igomit [66]

Answer:

Even Nobel economists refer to roads as “important examples of production of public goods,” ( Samuelson and Nordhaus 1985: 48-49). ... If a road is not congested, then one person's use does not effect anyone else. In this case, use is not rival in consumption, and the road is a public good.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
John is planning to take out a personal loan for $4,500 to buy a car. He would like to keep his monthly payments at or below $15
klemol [59]

The greatest interest rate that John can accept and meet the criteria is  12.25% compounded monthly

 The monthly payment formula for a loan:

p= (\frac{pv \times r}{1-(1+r} )^{nt}

Where PV is the principal value of the loan,

r is the rate per month,

n is the number of months,

Here, PV = $ 4,500, n = 36,

Let r be the annual rate of interest,

P ≤ 150

p= (\frac{4500 \times \frac{r}{12} }{1-(1+\frac{r}{12}} )^{36}\leq 150

375\times r \leq 150-150\times (1+\frac{r}{12})^{36}

r\leq 0.1225

Thus, the greatest annual interest rate = 0.1225 = 12.25 %

Therefore, Option C is correct.

To know more about the monthly payments and interest rate, refer to the link below:

brainly.com/question/2557439

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You are assigned to resolve a conflict between two departments of an organization. Both parties have equal power. Both parties a
Trava [24]

Answer:

The answer is d. Compromising

Explanation:

Compromising conflict style attempts to balance the needs of both or all sides in a conflict by encouraging everyone to give in on at least some points.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the difference between the production and the distribution of an
    12·1 answer
  • In the context of experimental research, the logic of random assignment is
    12·1 answer
  • Cold Boxes Ltd. has 100 bonds outstanding (maturity value = $1,000). The nominal required rate of return on these bonds is curre
    15·1 answer
  • An institutional lender is willing to make a loan for $1 million on an office building at a 10% interest (accrual) rate with pay
    13·1 answer
  • Assume that the required reserve ratio is 10 percent, banks keep no excess reserves and borrowers deposit all loans made by bank
    9·1 answer
  • Explain why unions have declined in power in the last few decades.
    9·1 answer
  • Why might a conflict of objectives exist between the management and workforce of a company ​
    10·1 answer
  • A balance sheet includes all of the following except
    10·2 answers
  • Ken and Joe are out at a bar drinking. During the evening, Ken writes a note on a cocktail napkin agreeing to sell his car to Jo
    11·1 answer
  • If your company’s product is mobile phones, do you think it would make better strategic sense to employ a multidomestic strategy
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!