In competitive market equilibrium, the allocation of the social surplus is such that no individual can be made better off without making someone else worse off.
The phrase "competition equilibrium" refers to an equilibrium condition when the firm's goal of maximising profits and the customers' goal of maximising utility both aspire to reach an equilibrium price as a result of freely determined prices.
According to the theory of competitive equilibrium, the firm's supply of the product is equal to the market's demand for that same amount of the product. It is a circumstance in which neither the buyer nor the seller can strengthen their bargaining position with regard to the goods being sold.
Learn more about competitive market here brainly.com/question/13961518
#SPJ4
Answer:
$32,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the before-tax LIFO liquidation profit or loss that the company would report
Before-tax LIFO liquidation profit =8,000 Units × ($12.00 per unit – $9.00 per unit) + (12,000 units-10,000units)× ($12.00 per unit – $8 per unit)
Before-tax LIFO liquidation profit =(8,000 units× $3 per unit)+(2,000 units ×$4 per unit)
Before-tax LIFO liquidation profit =$24,000+$8,000
Before-tax LIFO liquidation profit =$32,000
Therefore the before-tax LIFO liquidation profit or loss that the company would report in a disclosure note will be $32,000
If a company spent that much on internet advertising and increased it by 17%, the new amount spent would be $12.87 million.
<h3>How much did the company spend on advertising?</h3>
The amount spent can be calculated as:
= Amount x ( 1 + increase in advertising)
Solving gives:
= 11 million x ( 1 + 17%)
= 11 x 1.17
= $12.87 million
Find out more on advertising expenses at brainly.com/question/24967768.
Answer:
strategic management: strategy formulation, strategy implementation, and evaluation and control.
Answer:
D : All options are correct
Explanation:
- The marginal buyer is the essence of demand curve while marginal seller is essence of supply curve.
- @ Q = 500 units, Selling Price is set at SP = $35
- @ Q = 500 units, Buying Price is set at BP = $40
- Since, SP ≠ BP our equilibrium price would be $ 37.5 assuming the price elasticity of demand and supply are equal. In any case the equilibrium price would lie in between [ 35 , 40 ] such that to prevent a shortage of units in near future.
- Moreover, if the seller decides to sell at price $35 then he must sell goods greater than 500 units to reach the equilibrium profits. However, it could also lead to excess of units or surplus.
- We see that from selling the goods at SP = $35 while the buyer is willing to pay BP = $40 for 500 goods, the seller would be under-profiting and would be earning $5*500 = $2,500 less than he would at equilibrium price of $40 and selling units greater than 500. Hence, 500 goods is not an efficient quantity of goods.
