There are good arguments on both sides as to when and how fast to reopen the economy. In my view, the answer will vary state by state and industry by industry. There’s also an enormous amount of uncertainty as to exactly how to determine the optimal policy. In that environment, there’s a great advantage to having these decisions be made at as local a level as possible. Thus, while I suspect that Sweden’s current policy is not optimal, that Nordic country is doing a great service to Europe by providing evidence on the consequences of an alternative policy path.
Giving too much power to any one person is dangerous, especially when that person might be influenced by political considerations that go beyond the best interest of the country as a whole:
That’s not to say Trump’s views are necessary wrong; rather that the procedure he uses to reach decisions is not reliable. Thus I’d still favor local control even if in one particular case you could convince me that the views of the person who happened to be president at the time were superior to the views of the average mayor or governor. In the long run, competition between states will produce better governance than central planning.
<span>The thing that many members of the convention felt was missing from the Constitution was a Bill of Rights, that specifically outlined the most important rights. </span>
I believe the answer is: <span>develop negative views of one another and behave in a hostile manner
During athletic competition, universities students would most likely involve in tribalism which develop a desire for their own team to dominate the competition. In this type of situation, hostile manner and negative attitude toward other teams are extremely normal.</span>
