Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
Answer:
structure and jurisdiction of the federal court system and created the position of attorney general.
Explanation:
Answer:
Absolutism.
Explanation:
As the exercise briefly explains, the absolutist belief states that there are no matters of opinion in ethics since moral judgments are the same for everyone, and your own are correct. That is, that there is a general moral system which involves only one truth. All in all, this system states that there is only one absolute reality, truth or morality.
Since not all the women have been asked (it's impossible, it would take too much time and be too expensive), we can only have an estimate - it's around 50%, or half the women.
The various statistics, depending on the county and a survey are between 40% and 60% - so that is the correct answer.
But as I said, depending on the sample and the source, that number can slightly vary.
Answer:
may you provide the text? will revise my answer...
Explanation:
