Answer:
Everything in law enforcement is a risk. From the moment you mark on duty until after you mark off city every single action you take is a liability.
The way we manage that (which amounts to tens of millions of incidents and interactions per year) is we try to hire the best officers that are available to us. We have exhaustive hiring processes and extensive training. All of these calls and incidents are highly dynamic and can go from mundane to life threatening in an instant. One single call can save or take a life. That’s why we have a very high level of autonomy. This is not a career field that lends itself to a lot of direct management especially micromanagement. It’s far too complex and far too dynamic to try.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Honestly it’s not dangerous to live on credit unless you DON’T PAY YOUR BILLS because with cash you have a higher chance of your money being lost or stolen, and with debit you can only pay exactly what you have in your account penny for penny, but with credit you can over spend a little on Thursday if your pay check comes tomorrow.
Please mark brainliest
Answer:
The answer to this question is C. rehabilitation.
Answer:
"Opponents of the War Powers Resolution have traditionally claimed that clause 11 confers upon Congress only a narrow piece of war power. Defenders of the Resolution have argued in contrast that the Resolution constitutes an exercise of congressional authority under the clause. This last contention pokes at the truth without quite striking it. The War Powers Resolution is not constitutional as an exercise of the war power. It is constitutional because it defines the war power. The War Powers Resolution is nothing more or less than a congressional definition of the word "war" in article I. A definition of this kind coupled with a reasonable enforcement mechanism is well within the power of Congress under a proper understanding of the constitutional system of checks and balances. The definition does not intrude on any presidential prerogative. The mechanisms chosen by Congress to enforce the provisions of the Resolution were reasonable in 1973 and, although matters have been complicated by the United States Supreme Court's decision late last Term in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, those mechanisms remain reasonable today."
Explanation:
Answer:
hey yo!
Explanation:
What do you need? (Sarcasm)
