Answer:
The last graph with the point (2,4).
Step-by-step explanation:
Make a table of the values, then graph.
Example:
X: -2, -1, 0, 1, 2
Y: 
, 
, 
, 1, 4
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
The reasoning is correct. The ratio of number of bulbs tested to defective bulbs is always 14 to 1.
<h3>
Step-by-step explanation:</h3>
We generally expect industrial processes to produce defects at about the same rate, meaning the proportion of defective product is generally considered to be a constant. Here, the proportion of defective bulbs is ...
... 1/14 = 2/28 = 6/84
so we expect it will be also 24/336. That is, the ratio of the number of bulbs tested to defective bulbs is expected to remain constant at about 14.
If that is 54.300 the greatest whole number would be 54 if it is supposed to be 54,300 then it would stay the same and be 54,300
Answer:
82.5% and 17.5%
Step-by-step explanation:
The telemarketer made 200 phone calls and only 35 people signed up. Therefore, we need to find the amount of people who didnt.
200 - 35 = 165
165 people did not sign up.
This meants that the frequency of getting a customer is 35/200 and not is 165/200. In percentages,
The relative frequency of not getting a customer is 82.5%
The relative frequency of getting a customer is 17.5%
Answer:
whatever the other sides are the missing one is that same length because a square's sides are all congruent
Step-by-step explanation:
