Answer:
Both options are valid, since in the hypothesis of the savanna it was argued that humans acquired bipedalism to be able to self-supply their food more effectively, and to have less body surface area exposed to the sun.
Explanation:
The saban hypothesis is believed to have originated in the saban, with the Austrolopitecus africanus being forced to affect this domain, which is why it acquired this adaptation mechanism.
The savanna had high grasslands, which also led to collaboration in this regard since they could be better camouflaged.
In addition, the human began to defend with the limbs of the upper limb, triggering the canines to decrease in size since it is not used as a defense mechanism.
The canine is a tooth that helps to tear carnivorous food, that is why the human also begins to have a more varied diet of fruits and seeds and that it can reach and take the bones of the tree to increase its height due to bipedalism.
Answer:
<em>The correct option is A) The cell theory is the result of explanations of scientists' observations and not a description of the cell structure as it relates to the function.</em>
Explanation:
The cell theory can never become a law because Scientific theories are well-tested explanations, while laws are well-tested descriptions of natural phenomena; one cannot become the other.
A scientific theory is subjected to be changed overtime but a law cannot change. We have observed many changes in the cell theory in the past and we might find changes in this theory in the future also. Hence, the cell theory can never become a law.
<span>the study of living organisms, divided into many specialized
fields that cover their morphology, physiology, anatomy, behavior,
origin, and distribution.</span>
Answer:
<u>40 seconds</u>
Explanation:
This is the answer for plato users.