1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
charle [14.2K]
3 years ago
14

Why was the Battle of Bunker Hill in 1775 considered a victory for the Continental army? The Continental army maintained its con

trol of Bunker Hill. The British army sustained heavy casualties. The Continental army forced British soldiers to retreat to Boston. The British army was forced to use most of its ammunition.
History
2 answers:
Shalnov [3]3 years ago
4 0

Explanation:

The Battle of Bunker Hill was fought on June 17, 1775, during the Siege of Boston in the early stages of the American Revolutionary War. The battle is named after Bunker Hill in Charlestown, Massachusetts, which was peripherally involved in the battle. It was the original objective of both the colonial and British troops, though the majority of combat took place on the adjacent hill which later became known as Breed's Hill.

On June 13, 1775, the leaders of the colonial forces besieging Boston learned that the British were planning to send troops out from the city to fortify the unoccupied hills surrounding the city, which would give them control of Boston Harbor. In response, 1,200 colonial troops under the command of William Prescott stealthily occupied Bunker Hill and Breed's Hill. During the night, the colonists constructed a strong redoubt on Breed's Hill, as well as smaller fortified lines across the Charlestown Peninsula.

By daybreak of June 17, the British became aware of the presence of colonial forces on the Peninsula and mounted an attack against them that day. Two assaults on the colonial positions were repulsed with significant British casualties; the third and final attack carried the redoubt after the defenders ran out of ammunition. The colonists retreated to Cambridge over Bunker Hill, leaving the British in control of the Peninsula.

The battle was a tactical, though somewhat Pyrrhic, victory for the British,as it proved to be a sobering experience for them, involving many more casualties than the Americans had incurred, including many officers. The battle had demonstrated that inexperienced militia were able to stand up to regular army troops in battle. Subsequently, the battle discouraged the British from any further frontal attacks against well defended front lines. American casualties were comparatively much fewer, although their losses included General Joseph Warren and Major Andrew McClary, the final casualty of the battle.

The battle led the British to adopt a more cautious planning and maneuver execution in future engagements, which was evident in the subsequent New York and New Jersey campaign, and arguably helped rather than hindered the American forces. Their new approach to battle was actually giving the Americans greater opportunity to retreat if defeat was imminent. The costly engagement also convinced the British of the need to hire substantial numbers of Hessian auxiliaries to bolster their strength in the face of the new and formidable Continental Army.

mash [69]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

b

    :)    :)    :)

Explanation:

You might be interested in
74. What led to the formation of the Mongol empire?
kvasek [131]
<span>Foremost, the Mongols produced a charismatic leader, Genghis Khan, who united the Mongol tribes in a dream of conquest and expansion.The Mongolian horse, a small and very tough infantry horse which could move very quickly and run long distances. Mongol troops were all horse-mounted and could move very quickly.The Mongol bow was a very small composite bow which could accurately shoot an arrow more than 200 yards. Combined with the fast-moving  horse mounted infantry, the Mongols had a great advantage.Mongol tactics focused on speed and mobility. If a city quickly surrendered, they were lenient, but if it resisted, they were ruthless.<span>When necessary, the Mongols were willing to co-opt needed talent. For instance, when they needed to lay siege to a city, they would rely on Chinese siege engineers to lay siege to Baghdad. Compared to the empires they conquered, they weren't racist in how they used people.</span></span>
4 0
3 years ago
which animal, brought from europe during the columbian exchange, made hunting for buffalo much easier for native americans?
Wewaii [24]
They brought horses. It was easier for them to catch up with the buffalo and hunt instead of having to throw weapons from a far and run after the Buffalo.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The US Democratic Party mostly inciudes members who are
Yuliya22 [10]

Answer:

US Democratic Party mostly includes members who are moderate, progressive, or liberal. The Democratic Party is one of the two significant concurrent federal parties in the United States, simultaneously with its opponent, the Republican Party. Democratic Party was established approximately 1828 by followers of Andrew Jackson, making it the world's most magnificent progressive political party.

In the US, the democratic party is an important and most recognized federal party in the United States. The chief characteristics of the party were financial liberalism and social conservativeness.

The foremost components were populism which established in the rural south. The party encouraged the modernized constitutional and whigs.

It supported agrarian concern, nation rights, the ineffective federal administration, and republicanism.

Democratic- republican was the sole party which prevailed during the war of 1812.

Historically, the party has expressed producers, workers, labor associations, spiritual and ethnic minorities as it has rejected uncontrolled banking and investment and supported reformist income charges. In international policy, interventionism was an aggressive declaration from 1913 to the mid-1960s. In the 1930s, the party initiated promoting welfare spending arrangements targeted at the underprivileged people of the nation.

<u><em>Hope this helps!</em></u>

8 0
3 years ago
What of these best summarizes this passage?
expeople1 [14]
I’m pretty sure it’s none of the above
8 0
3 years ago
Violence toward native americans
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

don’t you mean voilence towards african americans???

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A Confederation is a loose union of states, with a weak central government a strong alliance of states a loose union of countrie
    9·1 answer
  • George works in a factory and is a member of the labor union. He thinks his wages are low for the work that he does, so he tells
    15·2 answers
  • If you could go back in time, during which era would you choose to live in? Why?
    13·2 answers
  • Children were discouraged from working in cotton mills because their smaller size did not allow them to move among the machines
    10·1 answer
  • An astrolabe is a device used by navigators to determine latitude based on the position of stars.
    11·1 answer
  • Before running for president, Reagan was a..?
    15·2 answers
  • How do you feel about race relation? Please, state your own opinion.
    10·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby.
    13·1 answer
  • During the Shang dynasty, the<br> Chinese created objects made of?
    15·2 answers
  • Hat parts of Cortés's letter would be most interesting to a cultural historian?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!