Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
“They shall be so handles as to subserve the public good.”
How does the quote effect the same square deal idea that Roosevelt showed in the coal strike and northern security cases
Answer:
The quote shows that Roosevelt will organize trusts in order to promote good to the entire population.
Explanation:
The quote reinforces Roosevelt's position and objective in the face of the situation he finds himself in. He shows that he wants to establish an organizational administration and that he will promote a common good to all the public and the American society to which he has responsibilities, regardless of what happens.
<span>Conservative criticism of the equal rights amendment was largely based around the idea that this movement went against the "economic and social Darwinism" of the time--meaning that it was only natural for some people to have fewer rights than others. </span>
I believe it was the "Europe First" strategy. Hope this helped!
Answer:
It made foreign nations more likely to ally with the US
Explanation:
The foreign aid that was sent by the administration of John Kennedy to Latin America had the purpose of making the countries in this region allies of the United States. The principle at how the aid was expected to work was that the people and governments of these countries would be grateful to the United States and see them as a friend that tries to help them and develop them. While the idea was good for the United States, in practice it was not going as planned. Most of the Latin American countries had much more affinity toward the communism and socialism, which was something that the United States was actually fighting against, and unfortunately that led to numerous conflicts in this regions, most of which sponsored by the United States themselves.
<span>Freedom of speech is a bellweather: how any society tolerates those with minority, disfavored, or even obnoxious views will often speak to its performance on human rights more generally. In international law, access to information and free expression are two sides of the same coin, and both have found tremendous accelerators in the Internet and other forms of digital communication. At the same time, efforts to control speech and information are also accelerating, by both governments and private actors in the form of censorship, restrictions on access, and violent acts directed against those whose views or queries are seen as somehow dangerous or wrong. From our earliest days, when we were called The Fund for Free Expression, we have fought all forms of repression of speech, in all media, around the globe.</span>
