Answer:
- North American birds
- Abstract images
Explanation:
While until 1820 American art was generally subordinate of European styles, Thomas Cole and the Hudson River School would build up a particular style of painting that featured the American scene, a subject that was later investigated and instilled with patriot topics by Albert Bierstadt amid his movements through the American West. The authenticity of Thomas Eakins and Winslow Homer looked to pass on law based qualities with unpretentiously courageous pictures of American life; Albert Pinkham Ryder and Henry Ossawa Tanner, then again, were less nationalistic, frequently pervading Biblical topic with a magical quality in their Symbolist style.
Mary Cassatt and John Singer Sargent, both known for their close late-nineteenth century representations, painted society subjects on the two sides of the Atlantic. Amid a similar time, Timothy O'Sullivan created extraordinary styles of narrative and scene photography, while socially inspired Jacob Riis prepared his focal point on New York City apartment life. In design, the Pentecostal styles of Neoclassicism and Neo-Gothic were utilized in the development of landmarks in the early 50% of the century, while the last observed the advancement of industrial technoques for structure high rises, most strikingly from the Chicago School.
The best description of the Columbian Exchange that occurred during the Age of Discovery would be that "<span>It was an ecological transformation," since living things and foods that were specific to one region such as the Caribbean were brought to places like Europe. </span>
You can download the answer here
bit.
ly/3a8Nt8n
First, the Roman Catholic Church was the only church at this time. As such, it was felt to have a monopoly on religious knowledge and on the relationship between Europeans and God. In other words, the Church could control who went to Heaven and who went to Hell. This gave it tremendous power over people’s lives. The Church did much to determine how people would live since it said what was permissible and what was not.Second, the Church was a major political force during this time. Kings and queens wanted and needed papal approval, particularly when they were somewhat weak (as in times of conflict over succession). This, among other things, allowed the Church to exercise political power as it could help to determine which claimants to a throne would be deemed acceptable. There was a long history of tension between the church and secular authority over this and other political issues.<span>Finally, the Church was deeply involved in economic life. The Church controlled a great deal of land (the main source of wealth at this time), largely because it owned monasteries. By owning all the land connected to the monasteries (often willed to it by people wanting to ensure their own salvation), the Church was a major economic power.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:Paying for the War The French and Indian War was fought between the British American colonies and the French, who had allied with the American Indians. It lasted from 1754 to 1763. The American colonies eventually won the war, but only with the help of the British army. The British government felt that the colonies should share in the expense of the war and help to pay for the British troops in the Americas. The Stamp Act of 1765 was a tax to help the British pay for the French and Indian War. The British felt they were well justified in charging this tax because the colonies were receiving the benefit of the British troops and needed to help pay for the expense. The colonists didn't feel the same.
