I think they just wouldnt report it, if im right i think that they have to pass that in a timespan of 1 year, so i think they just wouldnt report it so it would die on its own in a year
"As Lorena Hickok traveled through 32 states , she regularly penned letters to Harry Hopkins and the Roosevelts detailing what she saw. She reported that unemployment had devastated city dwellers and farmers alike . Those without jobs endured the hardships caused by economic insecurity as best they could "
-Quora
The Due Process Clause guarantees that states will not deny people any basic or essential liberties.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the 5th and the 14th amendments of the constitution of the United States of America, there are due processes provided and guaranteed to the people of the United States by the constitution.
This due process says that the state can in no way deny or deprive the basic rights of the people of the country which are the rights of life, property and the rights of liberty. The due process acts as the safeguard against any action taken for deprivation of these rights.
Answer:
The Roman Empire became less stable over the course of the Third to Fifth centuries CE. Historians point to internal divisions as well as repeated invasions from tribes such as the Huns and the Visigoths as reasons why the Empire fell. The fall of the Western Roman Empire occurred in 476 CE.
Explanation:
Before the act of emancipation was approved in July 1776, the Thirteen Colonies and the Kingdom of Great Britain had been at war for more than a year. Relations between the two had deteriorated since 1763. The British Parliament enacted a series of measures to increase taxes in the colonies, such as the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Act of 1767. The Legislative Body considered that these regulations were a legitimate means for the colonies to pay a fair share for the costs of keeping them in the British Empire.
However, many settlers had developed a different concept of the empire. The colonies were not directly represented in the Parliament and the settlers argued that this legislative body had no right to assign taxes. This fiscal dispute was part of a greater divergence between the British and American interpretations of the Constitution of Great Britain and the scope of Parliament's authority in the colonies. The orthodox view of the British - dating back to the Glorious Revolution of 1688 - argued that Parliament had supreme authority throughout the empire and, by extension, everything that Parliament did was constitutional. However, in the colonies the idea had developed that the British Constitution recognized certain fundamental rights that the government could not violate, not even Parliament. After the laws of Townshend, some essayists even began to question whether the Parliament had any legitimate jurisdiction in the colonies. Anticipating the creation of the Commonwealth of Nations, in 1774 the American literati - among them Samuel Adams, James Wilson and Thomas Jefferson - discussed whether the authority of Parliament was limited only to Great Britain and that the colonies -which had their own legislatures- they should relate to the rest of the empire solely because of their loyalty to the Crown.
