Explosive materials - because they might explode in the mail
The positivist thesis does not say that law’s merits are unintelligible, unimportant, or peripheral to the philosophy of law. It says that they do not determine whether laws or legal systems exist. Whether a society has a legal system depends on the presence of certain structures of governance, not on the extent to which it satisfies ideals of justice, democracy, or the rule of law. What laws are in force in that system depends on what social standards its officials recognize as authoritative; for example, legislative enactments, judicial decisions, or social customs. The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism, law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered, decided, practiced, tolerated, etc.). Austin thought the thesis “simple and glaring”. While it is probably the dominant view among analytically inclined philosophers of law, it is also the subject of competing interpretations together with persistent criticisms and misunderstandings.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>In guidelines known as Circular 230, the IRS says that an expert can't charge an unforeseen expense for administrations rendered regarding any issue before the IRS, with three exceptions.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
One place where unexpected charges might be particularly helpful is the <em>place the citizen</em> is attempting to get cash once more from the IRS in a claim. Duty discount suits may loan themselves to unforeseen charges, and the IRS has endorsed <em>unexpected expenses in that unique circumstance</em>.
Truly, truth is stranger than fiction, this is a zone controlled by the IRS. So to begin, regardless of whether your expense guide can offer you benefits on a possibility relies upon what <em>unforeseen charges are permitted by the IRS.</em>
Answer:
it indeed should be harder.
Explanation:
So every people can be sure who they need to choose and vote
