Answer:
The time period 1750-1900, compare the following: rationales for state expansion, processes of state expansion, and indigenous responses to state expansion is described below in complete details.
Explanation:
Enlightenment philosophers employed new forms of knowledge and empiricist methods to both the human relationship and natural world; they also reviewed the use that religion represented in common life and highlighted the significance of reason. Philosophers formed new political thoughts about the individual, the social contract, and the natural rights.
Http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.sosmath.com/algebra/inequalities/ineq01/ineq01.html&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwjXwL6qvsnRAhUIdiYKHU8sDdkQFggPMAA&sig2=wLL4VtnQtN-9CevOb4M7Qw&usg=AFQjCNGIZD-7guk9urORDLjgMCHb1LqHJg
Answer:
I'd say both! Because wether or not the decisions good or not, both of'em are going to have hard impacts. For example: When someone makes a good decision, like helping someone who needs to get their life on a right path or dealing with some hard or addictive habits can leave such tremendous impacts. Even when the decision to making the wrong choices become a harsh impact as well!
Explanation:
Monetary policy I think I’m sorry if I’m wrong
