1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
qwelly [4]
3 years ago
14

What do these cartoons say about the Republicans' failure to pass a new health care bill?

Law
1 answer:
Travka [436]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

La protesta de los Ciudadanos

You might be interested in
Someone please help me with this question!!!!
d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

the others are already answered

Explanation:

For general intent, the prosecution need only prove that the defendant intended to do the act in question, whereas proving specific intent would require the prosecution to prove that the defendant intended to bring about a specific consequence through his or her actions, or that he or she perform the action

3 0
3 years ago
HELP! FOR LAW STUDIES. 100 POINTS!!!
Leona [35]

Answer:The most valuable end of government is the liberty of its inhabitants. No possible advantages can compensate for the loss of this privilege."—Patrick Henry1.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a benefit of restoration justice, which the judge might have felt was valuable in Justin case?
Elis [28]

Answer:

In simple words, Restorative justice refers to the  legal strategy where one of the approaches to a case is to arrange a meeting between both the perpetrator including the complainant, often with members of the broader community.

Academic evaluation of restorative justice seems to be optimistic. Most findings indicate that it makes criminals less inclined to commit an offence. The 2007 research also indicates that it would have the greatest level of similar values and responsibility for any sort of justice.

6 0
3 years ago
I'm in there just no gonna show location ​I'm sorry for those of u in tornado watches
nikklg [1K]
Well that sucks, good luck to you guys in Arkansas.
6 0
2 years ago
In which case did the Supreme Court state that a seizure has occurred if the officer's conduct in conjunction with the questioni
german

Answer:

terry v. ohio

Explanation:

Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • The law relating to the employment relationship is based on the traditional law called master and servant, which evolved into th
    15·1 answer
  • What is law.what is constitutional law and mercantille law
    9·1 answer
  • What does an individual's effective tax rate indicate?
    13·1 answer
  • What states can I legally own a pet bat?
    9·2 answers
  • What do some police officers have to do to get in the academy?
    8·2 answers
  • California has been referred to as "the ungovernable state". Several governors have attempted to effectively govern the state in
    12·1 answer
  • What should be the punishment of those who eat pizza with pineaplle
    8·2 answers
  • How do it get through to customer service number
    15·1 answer
  • The Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) was founded in North Carolina at Shaw University. The SNCC is an example o
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following individuals has enrolled in a plan based on a fixed enrollment period?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!