Answer:
1. Invalid and weak
2. Invalid and strong.
Explanation:
The first argument does not present statements that support and justify it and for that reason, we can consider it a weak argument. In addition, the conclusion of the argument is not consistent with its premise, presenting a fallacy and causing wrong reasoning, which shows that the argument is invalid.
Similarly, the second argument has a conclusion that contradicts the information shown above, which invalidates the argument. However, the argument presents additional information that can support and justify it, for this reason, we can consider it a strong argument.
Some people might see u as boasting yourself or it might put them down about themselves
Options:
A. Behavior; often inaccurate.
B. Feelings;mostly accurate.
C. Attitude;highly insightful.
D. Behavior; mostly Complex.
E. Feelings; family-of-origin-base.
Answer:A. Behavior; often inaccurate.
Explanation:Richard Nisbett and Timothy D. Wilson are both psychologists who in a 1977 paper which they published challenged the directness and reliability of introspection.
Their published paper is one of the.mostly widely read and sighted research findings on the issue of consciousness.
According to Richard Nisbett and Timothy D. Wilson (1977), Subjects which we study had, "little or no introspective access to higher order cognitive processes".
Cultural socialization is the manner in which parents address specific racial and ethnic issues within the family. Cultural socialization also refers to the way parents communicate cultural values, beliefs, customs, and norms. It also refers to how the child takes in these values and beliefs.
