Okay I think there has been a transcription issue here because it appears to me there are two answers. However I can spot where some brackets might be missing, bear with me on that.
A direct variation, a phrase I haven't heard before, sounds a lot like a direct proportion, something I am familiar with. A direct proportion satisfies two criteria:
The gradient of the function is constant s the independent variable (x) varies
The graph passes through the origin. That is to say when x = 0, y = 0.
Looking at these graphs, two can immediately be ruled out. Clearly A and D pass through the origin, and the gradient is constant because they are linear functions, so they are direct variations.
This leaves B and C. The graph of 1/x does not have a constant gradient, so any stretch of this graph (to y = k/x for some constant k) will similarly not be direct variation. Indeed there is a special name for this function, inverse proportion/variation. It appears both B and C are inverse proportion, however if I interpret B as y = (2/5)x instead, it is actually linear.
This leaves C as the odd one out.
I hope this helps you :)
Answer:
Kendrick is making a buffet for his family. He needs 3x3/4 of flour to make it.
He doesn't know what store to go to either.
Answer:
466,56 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
1 yard = 36 inches
1 cubic yard = 36*36*36 = 46656 cubic inches
46656 = 20*5*l => l = 46656/100 = 466, 56 inches
Answer:
Positive, because the products (3) × (−3) and (−2) × (4) are negative and the product of two negative numbers is positive.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since 1 * -1 = -1, and -1 * -1 = 1, the product of opposite signs produces negative numbers while the product of same signs produces positive numbers. So the product of 1 * 1 * 1 * -1 = -1, while -1 * -1 * -1 * -1 = 1.
Answer:
ummm im pretty sure its d
Step-by-step explanation:
