Answer:
they tend to understand better .
Answer:
Muhammad recited the words God spoke to him.
Explanation:
In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.
The legal basis for this prohibition is because they are trying to end segregation as it was added to the billof rights. The federal laws are the ones who handle this type of issues as well as employment, housing,lending, public accommodations, and most importantly law enforcements.
Answer:
Rebecca should evaluate the claim with her logic and reason, because all arguments in order to be valid shoud be support by both: logic and facts or evidence.
Explanation:
If the claim for instance is not built with logical reasoning, even if the facts of the claim have scientific evidence that support the claim, it should still be evaluated.
She should also analyze the reasons for the claim, to see if it is valid to claim about.
