Answer:
Looks good to me.
Step-by-step explanation:
Looks good to me.
Answer:
7 to 3 is this answer
Step-by-step explanation:
if you noticed, with all the other ones they all have 3 : 7 in it. So by the process of elimination it's 7 to 3 that is different. I'll tell you why,
3 : 7, that is the ratio we have as an example. That's why it isn't the different one.
3 to 7, you say 3 : 7 as 3 to 7 to it still has the same ratio
3/7, this is how to type the fraction version of the ratio so it makes sense that it is the same one as 3 : 7.
7 to 3, if you haven't noticed yet, all of them has 3 : 7 as a counterpart. They are all the same but this one, this is 7 : 3 or 7 to 3. So with logic, this is the different ratio.
Answer:
To convert this fraction to a decimal, just divide the numerator (5) by the denominator (8): 5 ÷ 8 = 0.625. So,
5/8 = 0.625
Rounded values:
5/8 = 1 rounded to the nearest integer5/8 = 0.6 rounded to 1 decimal place5/8 = 0.63 rounded to 2 decimal places
Click to let others know, how helpful is it
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/8678447#readmore
Step-by-step explanation:
9514 1404 393
Answer:
In step 4, Jim's answer is incorrect.
Step-by-step explanation:
In step 1, Jim swaps the order of addends using the commutative property of addition.
In step 2, Jim uses the distributive property to factor -1 from the final two terms. (The associative property lets Jim move parentheses.)
6.1 +(-8.5 -1.3) . . . associative property
6.1 +(-1)(8.5 +1.3) . . . distributive property
In step 3, Jim has used the properties of real numbers to form the sum of two of them.
In step 4, Jim wrote an answer of 1.1, when the answer should have been -3.7. Jim's answer is incorrect.
__
The descriptive statements about steps 2 and 4 are both true.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
2(2x +4) - 2x = x + 18
4x +8 -2x = x +18
2x -x = 18-8
X = 10
Put the value of x in both side
Left side *+*+*+*+*+
2 ( 2*10+4)-2*10
48-20 = 28
Right side +*+*+*+*+*
X + 18
10+ 18 = 28
Mark it as Brainlist. Follow me for more answer
