1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yanka [14]
3 years ago
12

Of the uterus.

Biology
1 answer:
velikii [3]3 years ago
6 0
Follicle is your answer
You might be interested in
What idea is Malthus known for?
jenyasd209 [6]
<span>ogy of Human Populations: Thomas MalthusThomas Malthus (1766-1834) has a hallowed place in the history of biology, despite the fact that he and his contemporaries thought of him not as a biologist but as a political economist. Malthus grew up during a time of revolutions and new philosophies about human nature. He chose a conservative path, taking holy orders in 1797, and began to write essays attacking the notion that humans and society could be improved without limits.Population growth vs. the food supply
Malthus’ most famous work, which he published in 1798, was An Essay on the Principle of Population as it affects the Future Improvement of Society. In it, Malthus raised doubts about whether a nation could ever reach a point where laws would no longer be required, and in which everyone lived prosperously and harmoniously. There was, he argued, a built-in agony to human existence, in that the growth of a population will always outrun its ability to feed itself. If every couple raised four children, the population could easily double in twenty-five years, and from then on, it would keep doubling. It would rise not arithmetically—by factors of three, four, five, and so on—but geometrically—by factors of four, eight, and sixteen.<span>
Between 1800 and 2000 the human population increased about six-fold. Has the food supply kept pace? Will there be enough food to support the projected population of 9.2 billion in 2050?</span>If a country’s population did explode this way, Malthus warned that there was no hope that the world’s food supply could keep up. Clearing new land for farming or improving the yields of crops might produce a bigger harvest, but it could only increase arithmetically, not geometrically. Unchecked population growth inevitably brought famine and misery. The only reason that humanity wasn’t already in perpetual famine was because its growth was continually checked by forces such as plagues, infanticide, and simply putting off marriage until middle age. Malthus argued that population growth doomed any efforts to improve the lot of the poor. Extra money would allow the poor to have more children, only hastening the nation’s appointment with famine.A new view of humans
Malthus made his groundbreaking economic arguments by treating human beings in a groundbreaking way. Rather than focusing on the individual, he looked at humans as groups of individuals, all of whom were subject to the same basic laws of behavior. He used the same principles that an ecologist would use studying a population of animals or plants. And indeed, Malthus pointed out that the same forces of fertility and starvation that shaped the human race were also at work on animals and plants. If flies went unchecked in their maggot-making, the world would soon be knee-deep in them. Most flies (and most members of any species you choose) must die without having any offspring. And thus when Darwinadapted Malthus’ ideas to his theory of evolution, it was clear to him that humans must evolve like any other animal.
</span>

7 0
3 years ago
Why is it impossible to understand the totality of the interactions among the organisms in the biosphere?
Aleonysh [2.5K]
In order to understand the totality of the interactions among the organisms in the biosphere, we need to at least understand <span>how the all genes function within organisms and </span>interact<span> with others organism and environment around it.
If we try to make this effort in a world where organisms will keep evolving and environment will keep changing like us, that tasks is impossible to finish.</span>
8 0
4 years ago
2 A certain species of snake in an ecosystem consumes frogs, salamanders, and small rodents.
Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

I hoped it help u out. Ur welcome :)

8 0
3 years ago
In the body, red blood cells have a much shorter lifetime than cheek cells.
anyanavicka [17]
Red blood cells do not have a nucleus.
It does not consist of a cell membrane or a cytoplasm.
It simply only transports oxygen around the body.
Pls mark me brainliest:)
8 0
3 years ago
Distilled water has a pH of 7. Milk has a pH of 6. Therefore, milk is: A. 10 times less acidic than distilled water. B. half as
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

(C) 10 times more acidic than distilled water.

Explanation:

The pH scale is logarithmic, meaning a pH difference of one is a difference of 10 times.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Someone plz hurry up and answer!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Launch the concept map by clicking the button below. read the instructions that appear on the new screen. drag the terms and phr
    10·2 answers
  • Which class of anti-HIV drug targets the virus before it enters cells?
    11·1 answer
  • Why don’t magnets affect gamma rays as they pass over it?
    9·1 answer
  • Evaporative cooling is a product of evolution that has evolved in some organisms for use under certain environmental conditions.
    7·1 answer
  • What are the four elements that must be present in order for photosynthesis to occur?
    15·1 answer
  • The central nervous system includes
    5·2 answers
  • When doing medical research with human subjects, which four limitations are unavoidable?
    5·1 answer
  • Similarity between vestigial structures and homologous structures
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPPP I don’t understand this one
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!