Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
A pay off matrix has been attached.
If Fizzo decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of ($8 million) if Pop Hop advertises and a profit of ($15 million) if Pop Hop does not advertise.
If Fizzo decides not to advertise, then, it will earn a profit of ($2 million) if Pop Hop advertises and on the other hand, a profit of ($11 million) if Pop Hop does not advertise.
If Pop Hop advertises, then Fizzo makes a higher profit if it chooses (to advertise). On the other hand, if Pop Hop doesn't advertise, then Fizzo will make higher profit if it chooses (to advertise).
In a scenario whereby the firms act independently, the strategies that they will choose is that that both of the firms will prefer and choose to advertise.
Answer:
d. not selected option d copyright
Answer:
True
Explanation:
There are two reason which suggest that action will generate greater inequality.
1. some amount is stolen by government official thus fund is getting allocated to person who are already self-sufficient hence causing inequality
2. even left portion of fund is not allocated proportionally to all the area and thereby increasing the inequality.
Answer:
$155,700
Explanation:
Absorption costing
Sales $164 × 3,260 = $534,640
Less cost of goods sold
Opening inventory
Add variable cost of goods manufactured
[3,700 × ($51 + $32 + $6 = $89)] = $329,300
Fixed manufacturing cost
$88,800
Cost of goods available for sale
$418,100
Less ending inventory 440 × $89
$39,160
Cost of goods sold
$378,940
Gross margin
$155,700
Less variable selling and administration expenses $6 × 3,260
$19,560
Fixed selling and administrative expenses
$32,600
The total gross margin for the month under the absorption costing approach is $155,700
