Answer:
the correct answer is variously.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Since there is an agreement between AI and Betty and Betty did not honour the agreement which is even wrong, AI is entitled to recover $1,050 from Betty.
The $1,050 is derived by: the difference between the agreed price and the resale price, plus the incidental damages incurred during resale minus the amount saved in expenses.
That gives us: ($3,000 - $2,000) + $200 - $150
= $1,000 + $200 - $150
= $1,050.
Cheers.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
D is a little iffy. I can't imagine a company being in love with this practice and yet I know it is done. I think it's wrong but it is not the best answer.
B: This is not unethical. It's just not clever. You should listen to anyone who has an idea. At least you have developed good relations with other employees.
C: why would you not list the new skills you have acquired?
A: The Word embezzles should give you a hint. It's a nasty action. This is your answer.
Answer:
After cost of debt for a floatation cost of 2% is 6.62%
Explanation:
After tax cost of debt = Market interest × (1- tax rate)
We will get the cost of debt using the time value of money principle.
PV = -$1,000
Pmt = $1,000 × 9%
=$90
P/yr = 1
N = 20
FV =1,000
Tax rate = 25%
YTM
The market interest rate is 9% using financial calculator hence;
After-tax cost of debt = Market interest × (1-tax rate)
= 0.09 × (1 - 0.25)
= 0.0675 or 6.75%
If floatation cost is 2%, then
Net receipts after floatation cost = Cost × (1 - floatation rate)
= 0.0675 × (1- 0.02)
= 0.06615 or 6.62%
Answer:A
Explanation:
Veracity : This simply means conformity with truth or facts. Since Bjorn felt that the focus group did not give him fact, he would hereby, adopt veracity to achieve his secondary research.