Constituents choose their representatives to serve as delegates for their district under this paradigm.
<h3>Briefing:-</h3>
These delegates have no autonomy from the constituency other than the ability to vote for the actual representatives of the state. They merely serve as a conduit for the desires of their state or constituency.
<h3>What does it entail for a Congressman to serve as a delegate quillet and represent their constituents?</h3>
Delegate: A congressman who zealously promotes the immediate interests of people. a congressman who serves as a trustee on more complicated or less important matters and as a delegate on subjects that are important to their constituents.
<h3>What does it mean for a member of Congress to serve as a trustee for her constituents?</h3>
In this concept, voters choose their representatives to serve as "trustees" for their district. The autonomy of these "trustees" to decide and act according to their conscience, even if it means defying their voters' expressed wishes, is known as a free mandate.
To Know more about paradigm.
brainly.com/question/7463505
#SPJ4
Answer:
hired more generals your welcome
Answer:
c. Most people live in the central part of the country.
Explanation:
Answer:
For Congressional redistricting in 2003.
Explanation:
<em>What are special sessions?</em>
Special session amounts to legislative overtime. If there is a stalemate on some of the key issues in the government, a governor can decide to call for a special session. During special sessions, bills that are discussed should be on governor's agenda. Legislators have a period of 30 days to do their work, and it can be called for at any time.
<em>Texas Redistricting</em>
2003 Texas redistricting is a contraversional state plan for defining new Congresional districts. In 2002 Republicans won the control of the Texas state legislature for the first time in 130 years. Their plan was to work on establishing a majority in the House of Representatives seats from Texas, which was held by their own party. It is said that this redistricting violated the Voting Rights Act and was settled by the Supreme Court of the United States of America in a case called <em>League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry</em> in 2006. The Court ruled that only one District violated the aforementioned act.
