Based on social psychological findings, it has been observed that when people or roaches undertake a difficult task, the presence of others <u>Impairs</u> performance; when they undertake a simple task, the presence of others <u>enhances</u> performance.
This phenomenon is based on Social facilitation theory. This theory described that people generally become susceptible to social influence by becoming more aware of evaluation.
The factors that cause this Social Facilitation theory includes the following:
- Size of the audience;
- Supportive audience;
- Hostile audience;
- Nature of the task;
- Individuals coping skills
- Venue of the event, etc.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is <u>Impairs</u> and <u>Enhances</u>, respectively.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/46360
Answer:
The answer is primary metaphors.
Explanation:
Primary metaphors are based on a clear, side by side comparison of two concepts. This way, the meaning is fairly easy to interpret and does not require any specialised knowledge (that could happend in root metaphors, which are specific to a culture or identity) nor overanalysis, as could occur with complex metaphors.
Something interesting is that many primary metaphors may be considered by some as dead metaphors, which have become so familiar to readers that its use is now seen as "cheesy".
Answer:
A)Taoism influenced individuals to follow the flow of nature rather than rely on others to solve problem.
Explanation:
Taoism otherwise written as Daosim is a philosophical tradition of Chinese origin which deals and focus on people living in harmony by doing natural things and going with the flow in accordance with the Tao (or Dao), a cosmic force which exists in all things.
Attributed to Lao Tzu around 500 BCE, Taoism is also considered as religion, that preaches that man must place his will in harmony with the natural universe.
Hence, Taoism influenced individuals to follow the flow of nature rather than rely on others to solve problems.
Religious education is important because it equips students with cultural, social, moral and spiritual knowledge that aids in mental and physical development within society. The lessons learned in religious education prepare students for responsibilities, experiences and opportunities later in life.
The relationship between the level of religiosity and the level of education has been studied since the second half of the 20th century.
The parameters of the two components are diverse: the "level of religiosity" remains a concept which is difficult to differentiate scientifically, while the "level of education" is easier to compile, such as official data on this topic, because data on education is publicly accessible in many countries.
Different studies lead to contrasting conclusions regarding the relationship, depending on whether "religiosity" is measured by religious practices (attendance at places of worship, for example) or specific religious beliefs (belief in miracles, for example), with notable differences between nations. For example, one international study states that in some Western nations the intensity of beliefs decreases with education, but attendance and religious practice increases.[1] Other studies indicate that the religious have higher education than the non-religious.[2] Other studies find that the positive correlation with low or non religiosity and education has been reversed in the past few decades.[3][4]
In terms of university professors, one study concluded that in the US, the majority of professors, even at "elite" universities, were religious.[5]
Explanation: