Answer:
Taft-Hartley Act
Explanation:
Taft-Hartley Act is also known as the labour management relations act of 1947 and it restricts the activities and powers of labour unions. It stops unions for engaging in unfair labour practices such as jurisdictional strike, wild strike, political strike, secondary boycotts, and monetary donations to political campaigns.
Robert has violated the Taft-Hartley act by creating a fictional role in the company in order to get his cousin a job.
Given:
130,500 net pay to employees
19,000 income tax withholding
5,000 FICA withholding
130,500 + 19,000 + 5,000 + 5,000 = 159,500
<span>The total wages and payroll tax expense to the company for this pay period, excluding any unemployment taxes, is $159,500.
</span>
The 5,000 is added twice because the first 5,000 is withheld from the employees salary as the employees share. The employer also has to pay off 5,000 as employer's share to the employee's FICA withholding. Thus, the presence of the 2nd 5,000.
FICA, <span> Federal Insurance Contributions Act,</span> is composed of
1) <span>6.2 % Social Security tax;
2) <span>1.45 % Medicare tax (the “regular” Medicare tax); and
3) 0.9 % of a Medicare surtax starting 2013 for employees earning over $200,000.
</span></span>
Answer:
The maximum growth rate to my calculations is 8.32%, since it is closer to option E), I´d choose E) 8.37%
Explanation:
Hi, in order to find the growth rate given all the info of the problem, we need to use the following formula.

Where:
g = growth rate
b=retention ratio
R = return on equity
Since R = Earnings / Equity, and our dividend payout ratio (equals to 1 - b)our fromula changes to:

So, everything should look like this:

So, the growth rate is equal to 8.32% but this option is not available, therefore we´ll go for the closest one, that is E) 8.37%.
Best of luck.
Answer:
The correct answer is to put the two variables in the same type of measure.
Explanation:
To begin with, in order to compare to different variables that are in different measures the correct way to proceed is to put them in the same measure so therefore they will be comparable with each other. Once said that, in this case the person should put the psychological benefits in economics benefits as it is the other variable and in order to do that the person should think of what aspects of his productivity would increase if he takes the vacations and gains the psychological benefits. For example, after getting back from the holidays he may feel himself less stress and more relax and therefore that he may be able to either do more job, more studies or more excercises and all that can impact in an economic way.
Answer:
1. Total implicit cost per year = $66,000
2. Total cost per year = $337,000
Explanation:
Given:
Salary = $60,000
Investment = $100,000
Rent = $75,000
Wages = $190,000
Materials and utilities = $6,000
Rate of return = 6%
Computation:
1. Total implicit cost per year:
Total implicit cost per year = Salary give up + Return on investment
Total implicit cost per year = $60,000 + ($100,000 x 6%)
Total implicit cost per year = $60,000 + $6,000
Total implicit cost per year = $66,000
2. Total cost per year:
Total cost per year = Total implicit cost per year + Rent + Wages + Materials and utilities
Total cost per year = $66,000 + $75,000 + $190,000 + $6,000
Total cost per year = $337,000