Through much of the nineteenth century, Great Britain avoided the kind of social upheaval that intermittently plagued the Continent between 1815 and 1870. Supporters of Britain claimed that this success derived from a tradition of vibrant parliamentary democracy. While this claim holds some truth, the Great Reform Bill of 1832, the landmark legislation that began extending the franchise to more Englishmen, still left the vote to only twenty percent of the male population. A second reform bill passed in 1867 vertically expanded voting rights, but power remained in the hands of a minority--property-owning elites with a common background, a common education, and an essentially common outlook on domestic and foreign policy. The pace of reform in England outdistanced that of the rest of Europe, but for all that remained slow. Though the Liberals and Conservatives did advance different philosophy on the economy and government in its most basic sense, the common brotherhood on all representatives in parliament assured a relatively stable policy-making history.
Sorry it's so long but that's the answer toy your question...Hope this helps:)
Answer:
A. Support for the presidential candidacy of William Jennings Bryan.
Explanation:
At that time, the imperialist want to make the economy with gold alone as the medium of exchange, which mean that almost all power in society would be held by the nobles and the wealthy since common people would most likely cannot had access to gold. William Jennings Bryan was one of the most prominent figure that oppose this policy.
Answer:
mark most brainliest have great day
Explanation:
Answer:
1) Resolving conflict through peaceful discussion and cooperation.
2) Peace Corps
3) International Court of Justice
4) International Res Cross
i really hope this helps
Explanation:
Answer:
You could talk about the first amendment, and how it says that congress can't pass laws that "abridge" your freedom of speech. People should be able to say whatever they want, so the public should be held responsible for what people can or cannot say, not the government.
