1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nordsb [41]
2 years ago
13

Given that x = 5.4 m and 0 = 26°, work out BC rounded to 3 SF.

Mathematics
1 answer:
bagirrra123 [75]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

BC ≈ 4.85 m

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the cosine ratio in the right triangle

cos26° = \frac{adjacent}{hypotenuse} = \frac{BC}{AC} = \frac{BC}{5.4} ( cross- multiply )

5.4 × cos26° = BC , then

BC ≈ 4.85 m ( to 3 s f )

You might be interested in
1. Find the product. Simplify. 13/14 of 10/9. A. 15/42 B. 5/21 C. 2/7 D. 5/6 2. Andy has 5 pots, and each pot can hold 3/8 pound
Rufina [12.5K]

1) Resultant fraction: \frac{65}{63}

2) Total soil: 1\frac{7}{8} pounds

3) Result of the product: \frac{35}{2}

Step-by-step explanation:

1)

In this problem, we want to find the product between the two fractions

\frac{13}{14}

and

\frac{10}{9}

In order to find this product, we have to multiply the numerators of each fraction and the denominators of each fraction. We get:

\frac{13}{14}\cdot \frac{10}{9}=\frac{13\cdot 10}{14\cdot 9}=\frac{130}{126}

Now we simplify, dividing both numerator and denominator by 2:

\frac{130/2}{126/2}=\frac{65}{63}

And the fraction cannot be further simplified.

2)

Here we have:

n = 5 (number of pots that Andy has)

s=\frac{3}{8} (amount of soil (in pounds) that each pot can contain)

In order to find the amount of soil that Andy needs to fill all the pots, we have to multiply the number of pots (n) by the amount of soil that each pot can contain (s).

If we do so, we find:

t=n \cdot s = 5 \cdot \frac{3}{8}=\frac{5\cdot 3}{8}=\frac{15}{8}

Which can be rewritten as a mixed fraction as:

\frac{15}{8}=\frac{8+7}{8}=\frac{8}{8}+\frac{7}{8}=1\frac{7}{8}

3)

Here we want to find the result of the following product:

4\frac{2}{3}\cdot 3\frac{3}{4}

In order to do so, we first have to rewrite each fraction as an improper fraction.

For the 1st fraction:

4\frac{2}{3}=\frac{4\cdot 3+2}{3}=\frac{12+2}{3}=\frac{14}{3}

For the 2nd fraction:

3\frac{3}{4}=\frac{3\cdot 4+3}{4}=\frac{12+3}{4}=\frac{15}{4}

Now we can finally find the product of the two fractions:

\frac{14}{3}\cdot \frac{15}{4}=\frac{14\cdot 15}{3\cdot 4}=\frac{210}{12}=\frac{35}{2}

Where in the last step, we divide both the numerator and the denominator by 6.

Learn more about fractions:

brainly.com/question/605571

brainly.com/question/1312102

#LearnwithBrainly

6 0
3 years ago
In gym class students were asked to form six equal groups. If there were 18 students in each group, then how many total students
Contact [7]

Answer:108

Step-by-step explanation:

18 times 6 is 108

7 0
2 years ago
Country Financial, a financial services company, uses surveys of adults age and older to determine if personal financial fitness
Yakvenalex [24]

Complete Question

Country financials, a financial services company, uses surveys of adults age 18 and older to determine if personal financial fitness is changing over time. In February 2012, a sample of 1000 adults showed 410 indicating that their financial security was more that fair. In Feb 2010, a sample of 900 adults showed 315 indicating that their financial security was more than fair.

a

State the hypotheses that can be used to test for a significant difference between the population proportions for the two years.

b

What is the sample proportion indicating that their  financial security was more that fair in 2012?In 2010?

c

Conduct the hypothesis test and compute the p-value.At a .05 level of significance what is your conclusion?

Answer:

a

The null hypothesis is  H_o :  p_1 = p_2

The  alternative hypothesis is   H_a :  p_1  \ne  p_2

b

in 2012  \r  p_1  =0.41

in 2010  \r  p_2  =0.35  

c

The  p-value  is  p-value = 0.0072

The conclusion is

There is  sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of those indicating that  financial security is more fair in Feb 2010 is different from the proportion of  those indicating that financial security is more fair in Feb 2012.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The  sample size in 2012 is  n_1  =  1000

    The  number that indicated that their finance was more than fail is  k  =  410  

     The  sample  size in 2010  is  n_2  =  900

   The  number that indicated that their finance was more than fail is  u  =  315

     The  level of significance is  \alpha  =  0.05[/ex]The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o :  p_1 = p_2

The  alternative hypothesis is   H_a :  p_1  \ne  p_2

Generally the sample proportion for  2012 is mathematically represented as

     \r  p_1  =  \frac{k}{n_1}

=>   \r  p_1  =  \frac{410}{1000}

=>   \r  p_1  =0.41

Generally the sample proportion for  2010 is mathematically represented as

      \r  p_2  =  \frac{u}{n_2}

=>   \r  p_2  =  \frac{315}{900}

=>   \r  p_2  =0.35    

Generally the pooled sample proportion is mathematically represented as

      \r p =  \frac{k + u }{n_1 + n_2}

=>     \r p =  \frac{410 + 315 }{1000+ 900}

=>      \r p =  0.3816

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

     z =  \frac{( \r p_1 - \r p_2 ) - 0}{\sqrt{\r p (1 - \r p ) ( \frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} )}  }

 z =  \frac{( 0.41 -0.35 ) - 0}{\sqrt{0.3816 (1 - 0.3816 ) ( \frac{1}{1000} +\frac{1}{900} )}  }    

 

 z =  \frac{( 0.41 -0.35 ) - 0}{\sqrt{0.3816 (1 - 0.3816 ) ( \frac{1}{1000} +\frac{1}{900} )}  }

   z  =  2.688

Generally the p- value  is mathematically represented as  

      p-value = 2 P(Z >2.688  )

From the z -table  

      P(Z > 2.688) = 0.0036

So  

      p-value = 2 *0.0036

        p-value = 0.0072

So from the p-value  obtained we see that p-value  <  \alpha so we reject the null hypothesis

Thus there is  sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of financial security is more fair in Feb 2010 is different from the proportion of financial security is more fair in Feb 2012.

5 0
3 years ago
Each day jake donates money to the global hunger initiative according to how many lunch specials he sells. What is the constant
Vaselesa [24]

Since it's y/x, and x is what you input into the function (and y is what you get out), we get that the amount donated is based off of the lunch specials, so we get y(12)/x(60)=12/60=1/5Since it's y/x, and x is what you input into the function (and y is what you get out), we get that the amount donated is based off of the lunch specials, so we get y(12)/x(60)=12/60=1/5.

3 0
2 years ago
Explain how the Quotient of Powers was used to simplify this expression. (NEED HELP ASAP, 20 POINTS!)
taurus [48]
The answer to this question will be C
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A road crew must repave a road that is 45 miles long. they can repave 120 miles each hour. how long will it take the crew to rep
    8·1 answer
  • line p passes through points (2,13) and (9,8). line q is perpendicular to p what is the slope of line q?
    6·1 answer
  • If EF=2x-5, FG=3x-6, and EG=19 find the values of x, EF, and FG. The drawing is not to scale.
    12·1 answer
  • What is the Y-intercept ??
    6·1 answer
  • 2. What is the equation in slope-intercept form of the line that passes through the given points in
    11·1 answer
  • 30 points if correct.
    15·2 answers
  • Factor this equation 4x^2-5x-6
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone pleeeeeas helpp mehh it is I-Ready!!!!!​
    9·1 answer
  • I will mark u as the brainlest if you can help me with 4 question
    10·1 answer
  • What is the rate of change for this graph ​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!