The reason why Anglo-Saxon words were considered more useful than other languages is that the Germanic words were more common and direct than French o Latin ones, besides they were used to talk about concrete and direct things, as French and LAting words we use to talk about all the intangible things.
Later, Latin words started to replace German and nowadays they are more common than the old Eglish words that were straight forward.
The other options are not correct because the ones that seem more intelligent for people were the Latin an French words because of their bureaucratic use, German words were not complex at all, and there are not actually better words than other it's all relative, according to the society and kind of life and communication.
Answer: to explain different reactions to Dusbiber's ideas about Shakespeare from people with differing viewpoints.
Explanation:
The article mentioned above talks about how a high school teacher in Sacramento by the name of Dana Dusbiber believed that teaching students Shakespeare was no longer meaningful in this day and age.
The article explores the reason for her viewpoint and then shows different reactions to this viewpoints as well as other perceptions of the argument and their reasons for those perceptions.
Answer:
so I think that the fifth amendment in my own words would be change the reason why I say change is because it kind of changed the grand jury in a way if you think about it so if you change the way people did things and BC or before we switch to the Gregorian calendar I know it's kind of off but if you think about it it changed didn't it but it's more than change because they said it guarantees your right and it forbids a double jeopardy against self-incrimination so if you're in court and you got a case it protects your right against self-incrimination so nobody can do that to you and that's what I think about it
The answer is b because I said so
