I bought an apartment with my boyfriend last year because we had been dating for 4 years and he proposed. In order to prepare, we saved up our money, asked the bank for their opinion on the best coarse of action financially, and we tried to decide how much of our savings we should use without being irresponsible. (This is just an example. I am 15 and will be forever alone but yea this is what I would do anyways)
Using penetration pricing, a company initially charges a low price, both to discourage competition and to grab a sizeable share of the market.
In order to attract customers, the penetration pricing approach entails launching a new good or service at a cheap price. Gaining market share and aggressively attracting clients through low costs are the objectives. In a pricing strategy known as penetration pricing, a product's price is first set very low to quickly reach a large portion of the market and spread word of mouth. The tactic relies on the notion that consumers will transfer to the new brand as a result of the price reduction.
When companies launch a low price for a brand-new good or service, this is known as penetration pricing. Competitors are compelled to match the offer or immediately implement alternative techniques since the first price undercuts it. Customers of rivals could switch to the less expensive product.
Learn more about penetration pricing here: brainly.com/question/3521758
#SPJ4
Answer:
a) Since Scot and Vidia's ordinary income = $90,400 + $81,000 = $171,400, their marginal tax rate will be 24%, and they will owe $29,211 + [($171,400 - $171,500) x 24%] = $29,295 in taxes
They will also have to pay 15% of $5,000 (capital gains) = $750
b) Since Scot and Vidia's ordinary income = $90,400 - $81,000 = $9,400, their marginal tax rate will be 10%, and they will owe $9,400 in taxes
They will also have to pay 15% of $5,000 (capital gains) = $750
Answer:
the net cost of debt to a firm is generally less than the cost of equity.
Explanation:
If we assume both, investor in firms and lender to firms want's a certain return x
because the lender return (the interest) are tax deductible the net cost of debt will be: x ( 1 - t)
where t is the tax rate being rate beteen 0 and 1
as 1 less a fraction will be less than 1 we can stablish that:
x > x(1 - t)
x is the cost of equity
while x(1-t) is the net cost of debt
therefore, the cost of debt is lower than cost of equity.
