Bobby is right, because at x = -2, 3, and 5, the denominator of the function equals zero, which is by definition undefined.
Which correctly shows how to use the GCF and the distributive property to find an expression equivalent to 8 + 48? 4 (2 + 6) 4 (
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Bobby is right, because at x = -2, 3, and 5, the denominator of the function equals zero, which is by definition undefined.
First let's try to find the equation in this form : <span>y = mx + c
The gradient is given 3 . In a line's equation, x's coefficient represents the line's gradient.
So equation of a line with the gradient of 3, would look like this ;
</span>
<span>
Now a point that the line passes through is given, (1, 2)
This point's x-coordinate is 1 and y-coordinate is 2.
So we'll plug its x-coordinate value in the equation and also y-coordinate value. So we can solve it.
As you know, </span>
and 
We found c = -1
Also in a line's equation, c is constant and it represents the line's y-intercept
So let's build the line's equation.
and 
We found the line's equation in this form,
Now let's turn it into this form,
Final answers,
and
I hope this was clear enough :)
<span>
</span>
The gradient is given 3 . In a line's equation, x's coefficient represents the line's gradient.
So equation of a line with the gradient of 3, would look like this ;
</span>
<span>
Now a point that the line passes through is given, (1, 2)
This point's x-coordinate is 1 and y-coordinate is 2.
So we'll plug its x-coordinate value in the equation and also y-coordinate value. So we can solve it.
As you know, </span>
We found c = -1
Also in a line's equation, c is constant and it represents the line's y-intercept
So let's build the line's equation.
We found the line's equation in this form,
Now let's turn it into this form,
Final answers,
and
I hope this was clear enough :)
<span>
</span>