Answer:
The Slavery Abolition Act 1833
Explanation
Jefferson had a controversial stand on slavery. Despite being a pro-union man, he's known to own more than 500 slaves. Making the public questioned what's his true stance on slavery. But on the public platform, he stated that He promise that all men (both right and black) a set of unalienable rights that consist the right of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The Slavery Abolition Act 1833 banned slavery in all of British Territory. This act disturbed Jefferson's business considering the large part of his labor force used slaves.
An argument for why the Native Americans should have the right to remain on their lands would most likely be based on the fact that they have a historical right to this land and own it even without the standard documentation of ownership. Native American populations inhabited certain regions like the Western Plains for centuries and their removal was arguably unjust and against American values. Therefore, one could also argue that their land should be accorded to them based upon American respect for private property, human dignity, and liberty.
The
Berlin Wall
was constructed to nip in the bud any attempts by refugees to leave East
Berlin. Multitudes of East Germans envisaged fleeing from East Germany to the
Democratic West Germany through Berlin.To
avert this manifestly undesirable practice, the Communist East German
government erected the Berlin wall.
Antislavery advocates believed that slavery was morally wrong, while abolitionists did not. ... Antislavery advocates wanted to confine slavery to the border states, while abolitionists. wanted an immediate end to slavery everywhere.
