False.
the basic purpose of tort law is to provide civil remedies for the invasion of protected interests. Because of intentional tort requires intent, a harmful motive is required.
<span>Unfortunately, you did not support your question with the following options, so it is getting difficult to satisfy your task. But I have one statement that can help you and redirect on the right ideas : the dominant group feels superior to the minority, its members' self-concepts are strengthened.
I hope that you will find this information useful.
</span>
Answer:
Nepal has undergone and is consistently undergoing changes in its governance, and structure of society for which it has lead to frequent changes in the constitution.
Explanation:
The Government of Nepal act 1948, was changed because there were no democratic rights in the Constitution.
The first democratic constitution enacted in the year 1959 was scrapped by the King of Nepal because he felt that the constitution is trying to reduce his powers.
The next constitution enacted in 1962 was scrapped after a short period of time because it was an anti democratic constitution.
In the year 1990 the King of Nepal used the constitution for selfish needs.
Explanation:The Judiciary Act of 1789, officially titled "An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the United States," was signed into law by President George Washington on September 24, 1789. Article III of the Constitution established a Supreme Court, but left to Congress the authority to create lower federal courts as needed. Principally authored by Senator Oliver Ellsworth of Connecticut, the Judiciary Act of 1789 established the structure and jurisdiction of the federal court system and created the position of attorney general. Although amended throughout the years by Congress, the basic outline of the federal court system established by the First Congress remains largely intact today
Kit would appeal next to <span>the Minnesota Supreme Court.
The supreme court is the third and final court of appeal, which could only be entered if the case couldn't be resolved in both trial and state court.
Since the supreme court has the highest hierarchy between the three, every decisions made by the supreme court will override the previous decisions.</span>
