The third one because if you look up the question it say what they are in different wording, so I looked at all what they meant so it should be the third one
Ethnomethodologists explore <u>background </u>assumptions about how the world operates that underlie our behavior.
Ethnomethodology is the examination of how social order is produced in and through methods of social interplay. It commonly seeks to offer an alternative to mainstream sociological strategies. In its most radical form, it poses a project to the social sciences as an entire.
Ethnomethodology is the observation of how social order is produced in and thru strategies of social interplay. It normally seeks to offer an alternative to mainstream sociological methods. In its maximum radical form, it poses a project to the social sciences as an entire.
Phenomenology tackles constitutional problems epistemologically, through phenomenological psychology. Ethnomethodology tackles them sociologically, thru the ethnographic description of actors' reporting and accounting practices.
Learn more about Ethnomethodologists here brainly.com/question/14453990
#SPJ4
Answer:
Bearing in mind that it was Davidson that recommended the rope while stating the specific of the rope. The specifics of the rope would be considered facts, it is this facts that the court would find to be bounded to the warranty. On his part, Moon only stated the fact that he needs rope for his farm, but does not specify what he needs it for. The recommendation by Davidson for that specific rope is based only on the details that it would be used for the farm. This is pointing that, Moon is relying entirely on the seller, who knows about the product, to recommend him a type of rope.
However, there is need to put into consideration that Moon does not specify the exact use of the rope. This implies that Davidson states the he recommends the use of that specific rope.
With the argument back and forth between seller and buyer, there is no warranty at the instance that the seller breached an implied warranty of merchantability, but one can argue there was a
breach of implied warranty of particular purpose if it is taken into consideration that the use of that particular rope is not usually used in farms.
Explanation:
See answer
Explanation
This is the full question
The next section is a repeat of the music you just heard.
First, listen to the opening of this piece, with its two different melodies (one leaping, one with a repeated note and smooth motion):
Handel, Water Music, opening0:15
Now listen to the repeat that follows it:
Handel, Water Music, repeat0:10
While the melodies are the same, how does the music change when it repeats?
The answer is it's played by brass instruments
Answer:
Flexible
Explanation:
The ability for flexible thinking tend to allow these people to find solution to problems that is deemed as unconventional since they tend to see things with different perspective rather than the already established schema.
Most of the time, the product of their creativity and thinking cannot be directly accepted by general public, but their product still important for the advancement of our society.
