1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marin [14]
2 years ago
10

2. "Chaos and bloodshed already haunt us...and what about

History
1 answer:
Alisiya [41]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

He made a reference to the Boston Tea Party.

Explanation:

Hamilton speaks the sentence quoted above in response to the bookkeeper named Samuel Seabury who states that he is against starting a war against the united kingdom, because he believed that a war would only cause chaos in the country and the death of many people. However, Hamilton believed that the UK was already causing chaos and bloodshed, the Boston tea party was already an example of this.

You might be interested in
What is one feature that the U.S. Constitution and the Florida Constitution have in common
SCORPION-xisa [38]
Both the U.S. Constitution and the Florida constitution both have a Preamble.

The structure of the branches of government stated in the Florida constitution are similar to the structure stated in the U.S. Constitution. <em>(For example: Both of them state the judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court. The Legislative branch is split up into Senate and House of Representatives, just like it is stated in the U.S. Constitution, etc.)</em>
6 0
2 years ago
What is one example of a political party
lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:

Examples of dominant party systems include the People's Action Party in Singapore, the African National Congress in South Africa, the Cambodian People's Party in Cambodia, the Liberal Democratic Party in Japan, and the National Liberation Front in Algeria.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help
Monica [59]

Answer:

the causes of the French Revolution were several among which the following stand out

An inflexible monarchical regime against the context of a changing world, and that, after several attempts to adopt measures aimed at tackling the political and economic crisis

The nobility and the high clergy clinging to their feudal privileges, which blocked all structural reforms that were attempted from the Court

The development of a bourgeois class born centuries ago, which had achieved great power in the economic field and now began to advocate the politician. Her wealth and culture had raised her to the top spot in society, a position that was in contradiction with the existence of privileged estates, nobility and clergy.

The urban and peasantry popular classes, impoverished by rising prices - particularly cereals and bread, the continuous increase of stately and royal taxes and rights.

the expansion of new illustrated ideas;

The financial bankruptcy caused by the vices of the tax system, the misperception and inequality of taxes, the expenses of the Court, the costs of wars, and the serious financial problems caused by military support for the War of Independence of the United States. This military intervention would become a double-edged sword, because, despite France winning the war against Great Britain and thus recovering from the previous defeat in the Seven Years' War, the estate went bankrupt and with a significant foreign debt. The fiscal problems of the monarchy, together with the example of democracy of the new emancipated State precipitated the events.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Who was the first president
Novay_Z [31]
George Washington was the first president.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did hobbes and locke differ in their views on the role of government?
storchak [24]
Thomas Hobbes thought that all humans were naturally selfish and greedy, and needed the power of an absolute ruler to hold them back. He thought that the people should obey the rulers every word. Locke said that a true government was meant to protect all natural rights of a person, and that the people had to have a voice in government. He was against the monarchy, because he believed that it was not protecting the natural rights of the people, and reversely, going against them.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do courts set precedent
    11·1 answer
  • The Rabbula Gospels was an illustrated book of gospels that represented biblical events in a symbolic, abstract way. In the Cruc
    10·1 answer
  • Please help, i will give brainliest!! please :(( the question is: The primary difference between the Virginia Plan and the New J
    13·2 answers
  • Does communism allow citizens to elect leaders
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the British have to stay within 15 miles of the coast during the revolutionary war?
    6·2 answers
  • The population of Native Americans in Mexico and Central America were wiped out by the Spanish in the 1500's.
    5·1 answer
  • HELP 10 POINTS!!!<br><br> Saul was a: <br><br> scribe <br> Pharisee <br> Sadducee <br> Essene
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP THIS IS DUE IN AN HOUR!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Briefly explain one major difference between Schlesinger’s and Robinson’s historical interpretation of the impact of the new dea
    13·1 answer
  • Which market force contributed to the market crash? A. excessive federal debt, particularly from safety net programs B. a lack o
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!